VS

Kia Niro vs Mazda CX-30 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (138 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 25200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Mazda CX-30?

Niro

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two players are making a significant mark in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30. Both models offer distinct features that cater to a variety of driver preferences, whether you're looking for hybrid technology or dynamic performance. Let’s explore these two contenders in depth and see how they stack up against each other in terms of technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.

CX-30

Specifications Overview

The Kia Niro, available in full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, presents a unique opportunity for eco-conscious drivers. With a power output of up to 171 HP from its 1.6L 4-cylinder engine, the Niro excels in efficiency, boasting a fuel consumption rate as low as 4.4 L/100 km and a CO2 output of just 100 g/km. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 features a gasoline mild-hybrid engine that delivers up to 186 HP from a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine. Its fuel consumption figures are slightly higher, ranging from 5.7 L/100 km to 6.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions varying from 129 g/km to 148 g/km.

Niro

Performance Metrics

When it comes to acceleration, the Kia Niro offers respectable figures with a 0-100 km/h time of 10.4 seconds for the most performant variant. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 impressively races to the same mark in just 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty dynamics. The CX-30 also offers a top speed of up to 204 km/h, significantly exceeding the Niro's top speed of 160 km/h, which might appeal to those seeking a more exhilarating driving experience.

CX-30

Design and Comfort

Both vehicles feature modern SUV styling, but their designs reflect different philosophies. The Kia Niro has a practical and functional design, emphasizing aerodynamic efficiency and cargo space. With 451 liters of trunk capacity, it is ideal for families and adventure seekers. Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 boasts a more sculpted exterior and an upscale interior that focuses on delivering an engaging driving experience combined with ample comfort, offering a trunk capacity of 430 liters.

Niro

Interior Technology and Innovations

In terms of interior technology, both models are well-suited for the tech-savvy consumer. The Kia Niro comes equipped with a wide array of safety features and an advanced infotainment system with smartphone integration via Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. The Mazda CX-30 also incorporates a user-friendly infotainment system but places a stronger emphasis on a driver-centric cabin design, combining elegance with functionality.

CX-30

Driving Experience

The Niro’s hybrid engines provide a tranquil driving experience, making it perfect for city commuting while offering the flexibility of hybrid technology. Its adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist enhance the ease of driving. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30's suspension setup and steering response deliver a sporty handling characteristic, making it enjoyable to drive on twisty roads while still maintaining comfort for daily commutes.

Niro

Value for Money

Pricing both vehicles competitively in their segments, the Kia Niro attracts buyers looking for eco-friendly solutions without compromising on performance. The cost-effective operation is substantiated by its impressive fuel economy and lower emissions. Alternatively, the Mazda CX-30 justifies its price with a premium feel, sporty performance, and an array of cutting-edge safety features that enhance its value.

CX-30

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If efficiency and hybrid technology top your list, the Niro stands out as an excellent choice. However, if you seek sporty handling and a touch of luxury, the CX-30 may be better suited for your needs. Whichever you choose, both models represent exceptional value in the compact SUV class, offering unique qualities that cater to different driving styles and lifestyles.

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3900 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 4.50 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a evident edge – offering 186 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.10 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is minimal lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1474 kg. The difference is around 19 kg.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slight takes the win – 496 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Kia Niro
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08
Kia_Niro_HEV_24
Kia_Niro_HEV_22
Kia_Niro_HEV_05
Kia_Niro_HEV_13

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Kia Niro
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 33800 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 111 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1474 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1825 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
466 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
102 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Kia Niro
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Kia Niro and Renault Symbioz present a fascinating contrast in the growing hybrid and electric vehicle market. With the Niro’s practical design and impressive fuel efficiency, it appeals to everyday drivers looking for reliability. In contrast, the futuristic Renault Symbioz pushes boundaries …
Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for …
Kia EV3
Kia Niro
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives like a tech-savvy upstart — all-electric, sharp to drive and crammed with the latest infotainment and safety kit, ideal if you want a compact crossover that feels like the future. The Niro, meanwhile, stays the sensible all‑rounder: proven, roomy and available as a hybrid, …
Kia Niro
Renault Captur
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Renault Captur both offer distinct advantages catering to urban drivers. The Kia Niro stands out with its hybrid powertrain, delivering remarkable fuel efficiency without compromising on interior space. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.