In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid options, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize a sportier experience on the road. Ultimately, both models offer distinct advantages, catering to different preferences and lifestyles in today's competitive automotive market.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two players are making a significant mark in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30. Both models offer distinct features that cater to a variety of driver preferences, whether you're looking for hybrid technology or dynamic performance. Let’s explore these two contenders in depth and see how they stack up against each other in terms of technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.
The Kia Niro, available in full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, presents a unique opportunity for eco-conscious drivers. With a power output of up to 171 HP from its 1.6L 4-cylinder engine, the Niro excels in efficiency, boasting a fuel consumption rate as low as 4.4 L/100 km and a CO2 output of just 100 g/km. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 features a gasoline mild-hybrid engine that delivers up to 186 HP from a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine. Its fuel consumption figures are slightly higher, ranging from 5.7 L/100 km to 6.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions varying from 129 g/km to 148 g/km.
When it comes to acceleration, the Kia Niro offers respectable figures with a 0-100 km/h time of 10.4 seconds for the most performant variant. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 impressively races to the same mark in just 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty dynamics. The CX-30 also offers a top speed of up to 204 km/h, significantly exceeding the Niro's top speed of 160 km/h, which might appeal to those seeking a more exhilarating driving experience.
Both vehicles feature modern SUV styling, but their designs reflect different philosophies. The Kia Niro has a practical and functional design, emphasizing aerodynamic efficiency and cargo space. With 451 liters of trunk capacity, it is ideal for families and adventure seekers. Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 boasts a more sculpted exterior and an upscale interior that focuses on delivering an engaging driving experience combined with ample comfort, offering a trunk capacity of 430 liters.
In terms of interior technology, both models are well-suited for the tech-savvy consumer. The Kia Niro comes equipped with a wide array of safety features and an advanced infotainment system with smartphone integration via Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. The Mazda CX-30 also incorporates a user-friendly infotainment system but places a stronger emphasis on a driver-centric cabin design, combining elegance with functionality.
The Niro’s hybrid engines provide a tranquil driving experience, making it perfect for city commuting while offering the flexibility of hybrid technology. Its adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist enhance the ease of driving. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30's suspension setup and steering response deliver a sporty handling characteristic, making it enjoyable to drive on twisty roads while still maintaining comfort for daily commutes.
Pricing both vehicles competitively in their segments, the Kia Niro attracts buyers looking for eco-friendly solutions without compromising on performance. The cost-effective operation is substantiated by its impressive fuel economy and lower emissions. Alternatively, the Mazda CX-30 justifies its price with a premium feel, sporty performance, and an array of cutting-edge safety features that enhance its value.
Ultimately, the choice between the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If efficiency and hybrid technology top your list, the Niro stands out as an excellent choice. However, if you seek sporty handling and a touch of luxury, the CX-30 may be better suited for your needs. Whichever you choose, both models represent exceptional value in the compact SUV class, offering unique qualities that cater to different driving styles and lifestyles.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 28100 - 37800
£
|
Price
about 24800 - 36300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 4.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
59 - 65
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
19 - 100
g/km
|
co2
129 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594
kg
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587
kg
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451
L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430
L
|
Length
4420
mm
|
Length
4395
mm
|
Width
1825
mm
|
Width
1795
mm
|
Height
1545
mm
|
Height
1540
mm
|
Payload
466
kg
|
Payload
458 - 496
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
129 - 171
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.4 - 11.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
Max Speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
Torque
265
Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
95 - 126
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137
kW
|
Engine capacity
1580
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 161
km/h
|
Top speed
191 - 204
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.