Kia VS Mazda

VS

In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and eco-friendly hybrid options, making it an ideal choice for environmentally conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize a sportier experience on the road. Ultimately, both models offer distinct advantages, catering to different preferences and lifestyles in today's competitive automotive market.

Kia

details

Mazda

details

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two players are making a significant mark in the compact SUV segment: the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30. Both models offer distinct features that cater to a variety of driver preferences, whether you're looking for hybrid technology or dynamic performance. Let’s explore these two contenders in depth and see how they stack up against each other in terms of technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.

Specifications Overview

The Kia Niro, available in full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, presents a unique opportunity for eco-conscious drivers. With a power output of up to 171 HP from its 1.6L 4-cylinder engine, the Niro excels in efficiency, boasting a fuel consumption rate as low as 4.4 L/100 km and a CO2 output of just 100 g/km. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 features a gasoline mild-hybrid engine that delivers up to 186 HP from a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine. Its fuel consumption figures are slightly higher, ranging from 5.7 L/100 km to 6.6 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions varying from 129 g/km to 148 g/km.

Performance Metrics

When it comes to acceleration, the Kia Niro offers respectable figures with a 0-100 km/h time of 10.4 seconds for the most performant variant. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 impressively races to the same mark in just 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty dynamics. The CX-30 also offers a top speed of up to 204 km/h, significantly exceeding the Niro's top speed of 160 km/h, which might appeal to those seeking a more exhilarating driving experience.

Design and Comfort

Both vehicles feature modern SUV styling, but their designs reflect different philosophies. The Kia Niro has a practical and functional design, emphasizing aerodynamic efficiency and cargo space. With 451 liters of trunk capacity, it is ideal for families and adventure seekers. Conversely, the Mazda CX-30 boasts a more sculpted exterior and an upscale interior that focuses on delivering an engaging driving experience combined with ample comfort, offering a trunk capacity of 430 liters.

Interior Technology and Innovations

In terms of interior technology, both models are well-suited for the tech-savvy consumer. The Kia Niro comes equipped with a wide array of safety features and an advanced infotainment system with smartphone integration via Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. The Mazda CX-30 also incorporates a user-friendly infotainment system but places a stronger emphasis on a driver-centric cabin design, combining elegance with functionality.

Driving Experience

The Niro’s hybrid engines provide a tranquil driving experience, making it perfect for city commuting while offering the flexibility of hybrid technology. Its adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist enhance the ease of driving. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30's suspension setup and steering response deliver a sporty handling characteristic, making it enjoyable to drive on twisty roads while still maintaining comfort for daily commutes.

Value for Money

Pricing both vehicles competitively in their segments, the Kia Niro attracts buyers looking for eco-friendly solutions without compromising on performance. The cost-effective operation is substantiated by its impressive fuel economy and lower emissions. Alternatively, the Mazda CX-30 justifies its price with a premium feel, sporty performance, and an array of cutting-edge safety features that enhance its value.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Kia Niro and the Mazda CX-30 boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If efficiency and hybrid technology top your list, the Niro stands out as an excellent choice. However, if you seek sporty handling and a touch of luxury, the CX-30 may be better suited for your needs. Whichever you choose, both models represent exceptional value in the compact SUV class, offering unique qualities that cater to different driving styles and lifestyles.

Kia
Mazda

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 28100 - 37800 £
Price
about 24800 - 36300 £
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 4.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
59 - 65 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
19 - 100 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1540 mm
Payload
466 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
129 - 171 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.4 - 11.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
160 - 161 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
95 - 126 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Top speed
160 - 161 km/h
Top speed
191 - 204 km/h

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mazda

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.