VS

Kia Niro vs MINI Aceman - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (180 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 25500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or MINI Aceman?

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MINI Aceman has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3677 £.

As for electric range, the MINI Aceman performs significantly better – achieving up to 405 km, about 343 km more than the Kia Niro.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a noticeable edge – offering 258 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls evident stronger with 350 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

Niro

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is somewhat lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 246 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers clearly perceptible more room – 451 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 151 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs distinct better – up to 1445 L, which is about 440 L more than the MINI Aceman.

When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman slightly takes the win – 530 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Kia Niro
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £25,500
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14 - 16 kWh
  • Electric Range : 303 - 405 km

Kia Niro

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
Kia Niro
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption

Price
29100 - 38600 £
Price
25500 - 36200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
co2
53 - 111 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4079 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1754 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1514 mm
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Kia
Brand
MINI
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.