Compare performance (115 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (20,400 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or MG ZS?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment is heating up with the latest offerings from Kia and MG. The Kia Stonic and MG ZS are both designed to appeal to urban drivers who seek versatility, practicality, and a bit of style. In this article, we will dive into the technical aspects and innovations of both models, highlighting their strengths to help you make an informed choice.
The Kia Stonic offers a choice of petrol and mild-hybrid engines, with outputs ranging from 79 to 100 horsepower. The 998cc three-cylinder engines promise a swift drive with excellent fuel efficiency, boasting a consumption rate of around 5.5 to 5.8 L/100 km. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is achieved in a respectable 11.3 seconds for the more powerful variants, with a top speed of 179 km/h. The Stonic also employs a front-wheel-drive configuration and offers both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmission options.
On the other hand, the MG ZS stands out with its diverse engine lineup, which includes petrol, full hybrid, and fully electric variants. The petrol engine offers up to 116 HP, while the electric version can produce up to 156 HP, resulting in rapid acceleration of just 8.6 seconds for the EV model. The MG ZS caters to varied preferences with a consumption figure between 5 and 6.5 L/100 km and a promising electric range stretching to 440 km in ideal conditions.
When it comes to size, the MG ZS slightly edges out the Stonic. The ZS measures 4323 mm to 4430 mm in length, 1809 mm to 1818 mm in width, and 1649 mm in height, compared to the Stonic's 4140 mm length, 1760 mm width, and 1505 mm height. The Stonic might be more compact, making it easier to maneuver in tight city streets, but the ZS offers a more spacious interior.
In terms of trunk capacity, the MG ZS also has an advantage with 448 to 443 liters of space, compared to the Stonic’s 352 liters. This extra storage in the ZS could be a decisive factor for families or anyone needing to carry larger items regularly.
Both vehicles offer a roomy cabin suited for five passengers; however, the interior design and technology features highlight their respective brands’ philosophies. The Stonic boasts a modern aesthetic with a well-laid-out dashboard and ergonomic seats, emphasizing simplicity and driver comfort. It’s equipped with a user-friendly infotainment system including smartphone integration features.
The MG ZS, however, takes a more tech-savvy approach, making a notable mark with its advanced driver-assistance systems and infotainment options. The MG is designed to appeal to tech enthusiasts, featuring larger displays and optional connectivity features, making it a favorite for younger drivers or those who thrive on innovation.
Safety is a priority in both models, with the MG ZS currently boasting a CO2 efficiency class rating of A for its electric variant, marking it as an environmentally conscious option. The Kia Stonic also performs well in this aspect, with CO2 emissions ranging from 125 to 132 g/km for its petrol engines yet offering effective fuel economy.
Choosing between the Kia Stonic and MG ZS depends largely on individual preferences and needs. The Stonic is an efficient, compact SUV perfect for urban commuting, while the ZS presents a robust range of options including electric power and more interior space.
If you're looking for a practical, tech-forward choice with ample cargo space and modern features, the MG ZS makes a strong case. Conversely, for drivers seeking a nimble city car with exciting performance figures, the Kia Stonic remains a solid contender. Both models signify their brands' commitment to delivering exceptional value in the ever-competitive compact SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG ZS is a bit cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Kia Stonic costs 20,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,400 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers considerably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Stonic delivers visibly more torque with 200 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is a bit lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries marginally more – 470 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The MG ZS is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.
details
The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 128 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,760 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España