Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Kia Stonic's engine?

Up to 115 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Kia Stonic use?

On average, the Kia Stonic consumes 5.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Kia Stonic offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 352 L fit inside.

What are the Kia Stonic’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Kia Stonic is 4165 mm long, 1760 mm wide and 1520 mm high.

What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5 L.

What is the top speed of the MG ZS?

Depending on the model, top speed is 179 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the MG ZS?

The MG ZS measures 4430 mm long, 1818 mm wide and 1635 mm high.

Kia Stonic vs MG ZS - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Kia Stonic costs 20100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2143 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG ZS manages with 5 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a convincingly edge – offering 197 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Stonic performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 182 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Stonic pulls evident stronger with 200 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm difference.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is slightly lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG ZS offers evident more room – 443 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs noticeable better – up to 1457 L, which is about 302 L more than the Kia Stonic.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS hardly perceptible takes the win – 470 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Kia Stonic

Reviews MG ZS

4.1 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

MG ZS

Nissan Qashqai

VS

Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …

MG ZS

Nissan Juke

VS

The MG ZS and Nissan Juke represent two compelling options in the compact SUV segment, each appealing to distinct consumer preferences. While the ZS boasts a spacious interior and impressive value for money, the Juke stands out with its bold, iconic design and spirited performance. Ultimately, the …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20100 - 26600 £	Price 18000 - 24000 £
Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 5 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 133 g/km	co2 113 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 L	Fuel tank capacity 41 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1205 - 1270 kg	Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L	Trunk capacity 443 L
Length 4165 mm	Length 4430 mm
Width 1760 mm	Width 1818 mm
Height 1520 mm	Height 1635 mm
Max trunk capacity 1155 L	Max trunk capacity 1457 L
Payload 440 - 445 kg	Payload 375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 115 HP	Power HP 116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed 179 - 182 km/h	Max Speed 168 - 179 km/h
Torque 172 - 200 Nm	Torque 148 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 74 - 85 kW	Power kW 85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 998 cm3	Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3