In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinctive personalities and practical features. The Stonic excels with its stylish design and impressive warranty, offering a youthful vibe that appeals to urban drivers. Meanwhile, the T-Cross impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, making it a solid choice for families seeking versatility without sacrificing fun.
In the highly competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross stand out as two strong contenders. Both offer unique features, enticing designs, and an impressive array of technology and performance. In this article, we will compare these two models based on their technical specifications, innovations, and overall user experience.
The Kia Stonic boasts a sleek and sporty design characterized by its bold front grille, stylish LED headlights, and a compact stance. Measuring 4140 mm in length and 1760 mm in width, the Stonic has an assertive road presence complemented by a height of 1505 mm. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents a more robust and practical design. With slightly larger dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and a height of 1573 mm, the T-Cross provides a higher driving position, enhancing visibility for the driver.
The Kia Stonic is equipped with a choice of petrol engines, including a 1.0-liter 3-cylinder with outputs of 100 HP and 79 HP and a larger 1.2-liter 4-cylinder engine. In terms of performance, it offers acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 seconds for the 100 HP variant, while the fuel consumption ranges from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km. The T-Cross, on the other hand, features a more diverse engine lineup with petrol options including a 1.0-liter engine producing 95 HP and a more powerful 1.5-liter variant generating up to 150 HP. The T-Cross achieves acceleration in just 8.4 seconds, indicative of its sporty character, while maintaining a competitive fuel efficiency of 5.6 to 6 L/100km.
Both the Stonic and T-Cross offer manual and automatic transmission options, ensuring a driving experience that caters to different preferences. The Stonic features a manual gearbox as well as an automatic dual-clutch transmission, providing smooth and responsive gear changes. On the other hand, the T-Cross excels with its advanced DSG transmission, enhancing acceleration and efficiency while offering a more engaging driving experience.
Inside, the Kia Stonic provides ample space for five passengers with a trunk capacity of 352 liters, which is sufficient for daily use. The dashboard is well-equipped with modern connectivity features, including a touchscreen infotainment system compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. In contrast, the VW T-Cross shines with its spacious interior and impressive trunk capacity of 455 liters. The cabin also features high-quality materials and a modern layout, including a digital cockpit option that enhances the driving experience.
Safety is a priority for both manufacturers, with the Stonic offering a robust suite of safety features such as electronic stability control, traction control, and advanced driver-assistance systems. The T-Cross also excels in this area, featuring similar safety technologies alongside optional predictive cruise control and emergency braking, further enhancing its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.
In conclusion, both the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross bring unique strengths to the table. The Stonic stands out with its sporty design and efficient performance, making it a great fit for urban environments. Meanwhile, the T-Cross offers a larger interior, enhanced performance options, and superior technology, making it a compelling choice for families and those who prioritize space. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style, performance, and practicality in the ever-evolving subcompact SUV landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 19300 - 25400
£
|
Price
about 20900 - 31300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
125 - 132
g/km
|
co2
127 - 135
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
45
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1155 - 1260
kg
|
Curb weight
1254 - 1326
kg
|
Trunk capacity
352
L
|
Trunk capacity
455
L
|
Length
4140
mm
|
Length
4127
mm
|
Width
1760
mm
|
Width
1784
mm
|
Height
1505
mm
|
Height
1573
mm
|
Payload
445 - 455
kg
|
Payload
474 - 480
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
79 - 100
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 14.2
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.2
s
|
Max Speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
Torque
113 - 200
Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
58 - 74
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1197
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498
cm3
|
Top speed
158 - 179
km/h
|
Top speed
180 - 200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.