Compare performance (115 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (20,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or VW T-Cross?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the highly competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross stand out as two strong contenders. Both offer unique features, enticing designs, and an impressive array of technology and performance. In this article, we will compare these two models based on their technical specifications, innovations, and overall user experience.
The Kia Stonic boasts a sleek and sporty design characterized by its bold front grille, stylish LED headlights, and a compact stance. Measuring 4140 mm in length and 1760 mm in width, the Stonic has an assertive road presence complemented by a height of 1505 mm. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents a more robust and practical design. With slightly larger dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and a height of 1573 mm, the T-Cross provides a higher driving position, enhancing visibility for the driver.
The Kia Stonic is equipped with a choice of petrol engines, including a 1.0-liter 3-cylinder with outputs of 100 HP and 79 HP and a larger 1.2-liter 4-cylinder engine. In terms of performance, it offers acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 seconds for the 100 HP variant, while the fuel consumption ranges from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km. The T-Cross, on the other hand, features a more diverse engine lineup with petrol options including a 1.0-liter engine producing 95 HP and a more powerful 1.5-liter variant generating up to 150 HP. The T-Cross achieves acceleration in just 8.4 seconds, indicative of its sporty character, while maintaining a competitive fuel efficiency of 5.6 to 6 L/100km.
Both the Stonic and T-Cross offer manual and automatic transmission options, ensuring a driving experience that caters to different preferences. The Stonic features a manual gearbox as well as an automatic dual-clutch transmission, providing smooth and responsive gear changes. On the other hand, the T-Cross excels with its advanced DSG transmission, enhancing acceleration and efficiency while offering a more engaging driving experience.
Inside, the Kia Stonic provides ample space for five passengers with a trunk capacity of 352 liters, which is sufficient for daily use. The dashboard is well-equipped with modern connectivity features, including a touchscreen infotainment system compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. In contrast, the VW T-Cross shines with its spacious interior and impressive trunk capacity of 455 liters. The cabin also features high-quality materials and a modern layout, including a digital cockpit option that enhances the driving experience.
Safety is a priority for both manufacturers, with the Stonic offering a robust suite of safety features such as electronic stability control, traction control, and advanced driver-assistance systems. The T-Cross also excels in this area, featuring similar safety technologies alongside optional predictive cruise control and emergency braking, further enhancing its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.
In conclusion, both the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross bring unique strengths to the table. The Stonic stands out with its sporty design and efficient performance, making it a great fit for urban environments. Meanwhile, the T-Cross offers a larger interior, enhanced performance options, and superior technology, making it a compelling choice for families and those who prioritize space. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style, performance, and practicality in the ever-evolving subcompact SUV landscape.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia Stonic is marginally cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the VW T-Cross costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,003 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Cross offers noticeably more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Cross delivers moderately more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is marginally lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,267 kg. The difference is around 62 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers visibly more boot space – 455 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries barely more – 480 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The VW T-Cross stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.
details
The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 128 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
|
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,760 mm
|
Width
1,784 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España