VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,937 £.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 154 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is substantially lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 759 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more boot space – 585 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 489 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
serpimg_ikGkXb

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the Skoda Enyaq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.4
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 are two formidable contenders in the electric SUV market, each offering a unique blend of practicality and innovation. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and clever use of technology, making it a family-friendly choice with a touch of sophistication. …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
Kia EV3
Skoda Enyaq
VS
In the heated competition of electric vehicles, the Kia EV3 and Skoda Enyaq stand out with their unique blend of style and technology. The EV3 boasts a sporty design with impressive range, appealing to those who crave a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Enyaq prioritizes spaciousness and …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
443 - 489 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.