VS

Mazda 6 Estate vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (194 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Estate or Mazda CX-30?

Mazda 6 Estate vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Mazda 6 Estate

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

6 Estate

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is moderately cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mazda 6 Estate costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,295 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda 6 Estate with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Estate offers very slightly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 6 Estate is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 6 Estate delivers barely more torque with 258 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 18 Nm more.

6 Estate

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 6 Estate offers slightly more boot space – 522 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 6 Estate carries a bit more – 571 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 6 Estate

The Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.

details
2023_mazda6_global_wgn_20thsv_still_6_highres
2023_mazda6_global_wgn_20thsv_still_7_highres
2023_mazda6_global_homura_wgn_still_1_until_dec_2026_highres
2023_mazda6_global_sdn_20thsv_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda 6 Estate

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Kai
14 Jul 2026, 09:51:17

Very stylish and robust car that's consistently comfortable even on long journeys.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz present two compelling yet distinct choices for crossover enthusiasts. The CX-30 shines with its refined interior, agile handling, and a traditional gasoline powertrain that appeals to purists. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz, as an …
Citroen C4
Mazda CX-30
VS
Citroen C4 and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C4 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
VS
Audi Q2 and Mazda CX-30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is …
Mazda 6 Estate
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
155 - 172 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
522 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4,805 mm
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
1,480 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
483 - 571 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 6 Estate have?

The Mazda 6 Estate is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.