VS

Mazda 6 Saloon vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (38,500 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 6 Saloon or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda 6 Saloon vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda 6 Saloon

  • marginally lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

6 Saloon

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Enyaq is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mazda 6 Saloon costs 38,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,637 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mazda 6 Saloon. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 37 km more than the Mazda 6 Saloon.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda 6 Saloon takes 7.6 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 359 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 6 Saloon is marginally lighter – 2,027 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 47 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more boot space – 585 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 249 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries visibly more – 526 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 166 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
Mazda 6 Saloon
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 6 Saloon

The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Mazda 6 Saloon
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
336 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,921 mm
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,491 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 360 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
175 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.