What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

How fast can the Mazda CX-30 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 204 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-30?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 is 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Alpine A390?

The Alpine A390 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Alpine A390?

The Alpine A390 reaches a peak output of 470 HP, depending on the model.

How much electricity does the Alpine A390 use per 100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Alpine A390 consumes around 18.70 kWh.

How far can the Alpine A390 go on a full charge?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 555 km.

How large is the Alpine A390’s battery?

The battery capacity is 89 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Alpine A390?

Depending on the model, top speed is 220 km/h.

How many liters of cargo space does the Alpine A390 offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 532 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Alpine A390?

Overall, the Alpine A390 is 4615 mm long, 1885 mm wide and 1532 mm high.

Mazda CX-30 vs Alpine A390 – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Alpine A390 costs 57900 £. That’s a price difference of around 32623 £.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 has a decisively edge – offering 470 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 284 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A390 performs slight better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 16 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A390 pulls decisively stronger with 824 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 584 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is significantly lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2121 kg. The difference is around 666 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A390 offers somewhat more room – 532 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A390 performs somewhat better – up to 1643 L, which is about 237 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

Who wins the race?

The Alpine A390 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A390 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Alpine A390

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

VS

The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Yaris Cross

VS

In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25200 - 36800 £	Price 57900 - 66900 £
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 19.8 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 515 - 555 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 89 kWh
co2 129 - 148 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 48 - 51 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg	Curb weight 2121 kg
Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L	Trunk capacity 532 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4615 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1885 mm
Height 1540 mm	Height 1532 mm
Max trunk capacity 1398 - 1406 L	Max trunk capacity 1643 L
Payload 458 - 496 kg	Payload -

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed 191 - 204 km/h	Max Speed 200 - 220 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity -