VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Ariya comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 435 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 54,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Ariya?

Mazda CX-30 vs Nissan Ariya: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,143 £.

Ariya

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers substantially more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 249 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Ariya delivers significantly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is significantly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,277 kg. The difference is around 822 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers marginally more boot space – 430 L compared to 415 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries visibly more – 496 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Ariya is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£54,848
Ariya

Nissan Ariya

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 24.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_007
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_001
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_050
Ariya_2022_Dynamics_High_040
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_055
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_091
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_073

Reviews Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Nissan Ariya
Renault Scénic
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Ariya and the Renault Scenic comes down to whether you want a modern all-electric crossover focused on technology and range or a family-oriented Scenic that prioritises interior space and everyday practicality. The Ariya delivers electric driving, refined styling and …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Captur
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a premium interior and sporty driving dynamics that set it apart from the Renault Captur, which excels in practicality and customizable design. While the CX-30 appeals to those seeking a more engaging experience behind the wheel, the …
Mazda CX-30
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz present two compelling yet distinct choices for crossover enthusiasts. The CX-30 shines with its refined interior, agile handling, and a traditional gasoline powertrain that appeals to purists. Meanwhile, the Renault Symbioz, as an …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
2,277 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
415 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
363 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
435 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
600 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
320 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.