@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Peugeot 308 – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-30 or Peugeot 308?

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Peugeot 308

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

When it comes to the compact crossover segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Peugeot 308 are two strong contenders that appeal to diverse consumer needs. While both models promise a blend of style, performance, and innovative technology, they cater to slightly different audiences. This article explores the key aspects of both vehicles to help you decide which one deserves a spot in your garage.

308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Engine Performance and Variants

The Mazda CX-30 is powered by a range of efficient Petrol MHEV engines with options offering up to 186 HP. Available in manual and automatic transmissions, it provides a smooth and responsive driving experience. The engine's efficiency is commendable, with a fuel consumption range of 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, ideal for both city driving and longer journeys.

On the other hand, the Peugeot 308 offers a broader array of powertrains, including Petrol, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid, and Electric variants. The petrol engines can produce between 130 to 225 HP, depending on the configuration. Diesel options and hybrids contribute to varied consumption levels, as low as 1.3 L/100km for its electric configuration. This makes the 308 highly versatile for eco-conscious buyers seeking alternatives to traditional fuel engines.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Acceleration and Top Speed

When it comes to acceleration, the CX-30 delivers a satisfactory performance with a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 8.3 to 10.3 seconds depending on the engine choice. The maximum speed of 204 km/h ensures that you can confidently cruise on the highway.

Conversely, the Peugeot 308 shows competitive numbers, with its fastest variant reaching 0-100 km/h in just 7.5 seconds, showcasing its sporty edge. The top speed can reach up to 235 km/h, placing it in a slightly higher performance bracket, particularly for driving enthusiasts.

308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Interior Space and Comfort

Both vehicles offer seating for five, but they differ in interior dimensions. The CX-30 boasts a trunk capacity of 430 liters, making it suitable for families or those needing extra cargo space. The spacious interior reflects Mazda's commitment to comfort, with high-quality materials and user-friendly technology.

The Peugeot 308, while slightly smaller in trunk capacity at 412 liters, offers a practical layout and advanced multimedia features. The overall design emphasizes a more modern and tech-forward approach, with the i-Cockpit layout enhancing driver engagement.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Innovations and Tech Features

In terms of technology, the Mazda CX-30 comes equipped with the latest Mazda Connect system, featuring a responsive touchscreen and a comprehensive suite of safety features including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist. These innovations ensure a secure and entertaining drive.

The Peugeot 308, however, pushes the boundaries even further with its innovative hybrid variants and electric options. Features like the 10-inch touchscreen, a digital cockpit, and adaptive driving aids create an immersive driving experience. Additionally, the hybrid variants not only benefit from low emissions but also allow for a short electric-only range, catering to urban commuters.

308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of environmental impact, the Mazda CX-30 holds a CO2 efficiency class of D to E, which is commendable for an SUV. Its emissions range from 129 to 148 g/km, aligning well with current emissions standards.

In contrast, the Peugeot 308 performs notably better with efficiencies ranging from CO2 class A to C, thanks to its electric and hybrid options that emit as low as 30 g/km. This flexibility makes it appealing for those keen on reducing their carbon footprint.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Conclusion

Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-30 and Peugeot 308 depends on personal preferences and driving needs. If you prioritize a stylish crossover with solid performance and generous interior space, the CX-30 might be the perfect fit. However, for those looking for versatility, hybrid options, and cutting-edge technology, the Peugeot 308 certainly offers a compelling alternative.

Whichever model you choose, both vehicles embody innovation and performance, ensuring an engaging driving experience for a wide array of drivers.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Peugeot 308 costs 29200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4003 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 308 manages with 2.30 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 3.40 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 308 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 195 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 308 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 308 performs slight better – reaching 225 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 21 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 308 pulls somewhat stronger with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Peugeot 308 is barely noticeable lighter – 1453 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 2 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers minimal more room – 430 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1406 L, which is about 83 L more than the Peugeot 308.

When it comes to payload, Peugeot 308 hardly perceptible takes the win – 503 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Peugeot 308 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 308

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £29,200
308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Peugeot 308

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 131 - 195 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 5 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.60 kWh
  • Electric Range : 78 - 450 km

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details

Peugeot 308

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Peugeot 308 brings a sleek, feline profile and an unexpectedly upscale cabin, with clever packaging and materials that feel a touch more premium than you might expect. It’s composed on the road, easy to live with for daily life, and a smart choice if you want a stylish hatch that still behaves when the road gets interesting.

details
Mazda CX-30
Peugeot 308
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
308 @ Peugeot / Stellantis Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
29200 - 42600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.60 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
78 - 450 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.40 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1453 - 1749 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
314 - 412 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4367 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1852 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1438 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1258 - 1323 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
430 - 503 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
131 - 195 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 225 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
96 - 144 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Peugeot
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click