VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,643 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is a bit lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 229 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 480 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries moderately more – 563 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.