Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Skoda Kodiaq?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 4.20 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is a bit lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 229 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 480 L.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq to a small extent takes the win – 563 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.