@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
VS

Mazda CX-30 vs SsangYong Tivoli - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 163 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 21400 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or SsangYong Tivoli?

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

SsangYong Tivoli

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

SsangYong Tivoli has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 3814 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the SsangYong Tivoli with 7 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

Tivoli @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a somewhat edge – offering 186 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 23 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the SsangYong Tivoli tops out at 181 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SsangYong Tivoli pulls slightly stronger with 280 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, SsangYong Tivoli is hardly perceptible lighter – 1375 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Tivoli offers convincingly more room – 720 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 290 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Tivoli performs barely noticeable better – up to 1440 L, which is about 34 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 hardly perceptible takes the win – 496 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details
Mazda CX-30
SsangYong Tivoli

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

SsangYong Tivoli

The SsangYong Tivoli is an unpretentious small crossover that surprises with a roomy, well-finished cabin and an agreeable ride that suits everyday life. It won't win any beauty contests, but it's a smart, economical choice for buyers who value practicality, comfort and a bit of cheeky character.

details
SsangYong_Tivoli_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Tivoli_2021_Heckansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Tivoli_2021_Kofferraum_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews SsangYong Tivoli

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
SsangYong Tivoli
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Tivoli @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
21400 - 30300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
7 - 8.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
161 - 191 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1375 - 1492 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
395 - 720 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4225 - 4480 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1810 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1613 - 1646 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1115 - 1440 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
425 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
163 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 181 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
260 - 280 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
120 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1497 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2021 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SsangYong

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their unique design and driving dynamics. The Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology features, making it a popular choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its stylish …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q2
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
Unsure whether the Audi Q2 or the Mazda CX-30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson emerges as a versatile contender, boasting a spacious interior and cutting-edge technology features. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its engaging driving dynamics and premium interior aesthetics, making it a standout for …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its sporty handling and upscale interior, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.