VS

Mazda CX-30 vs XPeng G6 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 37,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or XPeng G6?

Mazda CX-30 vs XPeng G6: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

XPeng G6

4.5 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the XPeng G6 costs 37,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,666 £.

G6

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 301 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G6 delivers significantly more torque with 660 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 420 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is significantly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 610 kg.

Looking at boot space, the XPeng G6 offers visibly more boot space – 571 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 141 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries barely more – 496 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng G6 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,400
G6

XPeng G6

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 - 525 km
details

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Putting the XPeng G6 and ZEEKR 7GT side-by-side highlights two sharply styled Chinese electric contenders that each promise strong range, advanced tech and engaging performance. I’ll compare driving feel, range, interior quality and ownership value so you can see which one better fits your …
XPeng G6
XPeng G9
VS
The XPeng G6 and XPeng G9 are two electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the G6 is a compact, agile, tech-focused crossover, while the G9 is a larger, more premium flagship with greater range and comfort. This comparison highlights the key differences in size, range, performance, interior tech, …
Mazda CX-30
XPeng G6

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

XPeng G6

The XPeng G6 is a sleek, tech-focused electric crossover that pairs modern styling with a spacious, comfortable cabin. It delivers a refined, engaging driving experience and comes loaded with advanced driver-assistance and infotainment features that make it feel like a smarter, more connected car.

details
IMG_0237
IMG_0238

Reviews XPeng G6

4.5 (7 Reviews)
rate
FAUCONNIER
21 Jun 2026, 08:51:30

Very bad impression of customer service. New car delivered with dashboard errors, dealership unable to fix the problem for 2 months, no response from customer service despite 4 messages... this scares me for what’s to come....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Micha
26 May 2026, 12:50:42

After intensive test drives I ultimately went with the G6P and have never regretted it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Manijak
6 May 2026, 09:37:03

The Sealion is better finished and of higher quality. But it has higher consumption and charges noticeably slower.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Carlos
21 Jan 2026, 18:28:52

The Xpeng G6 strikes me as very convincing when it comes to technology, ultra-fast charging, comfort, and range — definitely worth keeping an eye on.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Choosing between the XPeng G6 and the MG MGS6 EV means weighing XPeng’s tech-heavy, aerodynamic approach against MG’s more value-oriented, practical offering. I’ll break down range, charging, driving feel, interior quality and running costs so you can pick the better fit for your needs.
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW Golf
VS
Mazda CX-30 vs Golf — two compact, sensible choices that target slightly different needs: the CX-30 brings SUV styling and a premium-feel cabin, while the Golf is the benchmark compact hatch for everyday practicality and versatility. Below I’ll run through the strengths and trade‑offs so you can …
XPeng G6
ZEEKR 7X
VS
XPeng G6 and Zeekr 7X are two advanced Chinese electric crossovers that pack strong tech, long-range batteries and ambitious driver‑assist features. In this head‑to‑head we'll compare performance, range and charging, interior quality and ownership costs so you can pick the better fit for your needs.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
XPeng G6

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
571 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
470 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
XPeng
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.