VS

Mazda CX-60 vs VW ID.3 – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or VW ID.3 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW ID.3 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28600 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 13337 £.

As for range, the VW ID.3 performs decisively better – achieving up to 605 km, about 541 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 326 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs minimal better – reaching 219 km/h, while the VW ID.3 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls minimal stronger with 550 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW ID.3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1787 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers distinct more room – 570 L compared to 385 L. That’s a difference of about 185 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs distinct better – up to 1726 L, which is about 459 L more than the VW ID.3.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.

Who wins the race?

The VW ID.3 proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
VW ID.3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £28,600
DB2020AU01067_medium

VW ID.3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 326 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.5 - 15.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 383 - 605 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

VW ID.3

5 (2)
rate

The VW ID.3 represents Volkswagen's entry into the world of electric vehicles, offering a modern design that combines functionality with sustainability. Inside, you'll find a spacious and tech-forward interior, providing a comfortable driving experience while maintaining a focus on environmentally friendly materials. The ID.3's performance delivers a smooth and responsive feel on the road, making it a strong contender in the growing electric car market.

details
DB2020AU01067_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2019AU01515_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2019AU01516_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01118_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01119_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01097_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2020AU01100_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Kia EV3
VW ID.3
VS
Pitted against each other, the Kia EV3 feels like the roomy, no-nonsense upstart — taller, more practical and geared toward families who want SUV style without the fuel bill — while the VW ID.3 is the sharper, more polished hatch that rewards drivers who prefer nimble handling and mature software. If you want more cargo and street presence, pick the EV3; if you care about a composed drive and a proven EV ecosystem, the ID.3 is the safer, smarter bet — so decide whether you want to haul bikes or out-engineer your commute.
Mazda CX-60
VW ID.3
CX-60
ID.3

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
28600 - 49300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1787 - 1993 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
385 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4264 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1809 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1267 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
437 - 473 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Line them up and the electric VW ID.3 comes off as the clever, zippy high-tech hatch you want for city runs and engaging driving, while the Skoda Elroq plays the straight man—roomy, practical and relentlessly sensible. Pick the ID.3 for zero‑emission fun and gadgetry; go for the Elroq if everyday space, value and no‑nonsense usability win out.
Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its striking design and engaging driving dynamics, making it a favorite among enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron offers a more understated yet sophisticated appeal, equipped with cutting-edge technology and a spacious interior that emphasizes comfort. Ultimately, the choice between these two solid contenders will hinge on individual preferences for sportiness versus practicality.
Hyundai Kona
VW ID.3
VS
In the electrified showdown between the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Volkswagen ID.3, both cars bring distinct advantages to the table. The Kona Electric shines with its impressive range and affordability, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious consumers seeking long-distance capabilities. On the other hand, the VW ID.3 offers a more premium feel and an innovative design, potentially appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and cutting-edge technology in their eco-friendly ride.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Volvo EX30 and the VW ID.3, each electric vehicle showcases its own unique strengths. The EX30 impresses with its Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, while the ID.3 highlights its spacious interior and impressive range for everyday driving. Ultimately, both models cater to eco-conscious consumers, but their differing philosophies make them appealing to varied tastes in the EV market.
Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle of retro charm versus modern innovation, the Renault R5 and VW ID.3 both offer distinct approaches to electric mobility. The R5 captivates with its nostalgic design and playful driving dynamics, while the ID.3 impresses with its advanced technology and spacious interior. Ultimately, choosing between these two models depends on whether you prioritize classic appeal or cutting-edge efficiency.
VW ID.3
VW ID.4
VS
In the electric vehicle arena, the VW ID.3 and ID.4 stand out as two compelling options from Volkswagen, catering to different consumer needs. While the ID.3 excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the ID.4 offers enhanced space and versatility, appealing to families and adventure seekers. Both models showcase Volkswagen's commitment to performance and sustainability, but the choice ultimately depends on lifestyle preferences and driving habits.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Peugeot 2008
VW ID.3
VS
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.