VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Ford Ranger?

Mazda CX-80 vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

Ford Ranger

  • only slightly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Ranger is only slightly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 889 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 18 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers noticeably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 274 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries noticeably more – 989 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 339 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Mazda CX-80
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
The Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Mazda CX-80
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
7
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.