@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
VS

Mazda CX-80 vs SsangYong Rexton – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or SsangYong Rexton?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

SsangYong Rexton has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41100 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7080 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.20 L. The difference is about 6.60 L per 100 km.

Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a distinct edge – offering 327 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.60 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs somewhat better – reaching 219 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls to a small extent stronger with 550 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 109 Nm difference.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is barely noticeable lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2145 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers decisively more room – 784 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 526 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton performs barely noticeable better – up to 1977 L, which is about 6 L more than the Mazda CX-80.

When it comes to payload, SsangYong Rexton slightly takes the win – 770 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton stands out in the SUV segment with its robust design and commanding presence on the road. It offers a spacious interior with high-quality materials, providing comfort and practicality for both driver and passengers. The Rexton combines off-road capability with modern technology, making it an attractive option for those seeking a versatile and durable vehicle.

details
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Frontansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Heckansicht_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Seitenansicht_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
1_SsangYong_neuer_Rexton_2020_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility
SsangYong_Motors_Deutschland_Rexton_2021_Innenansicht_1_300dpi @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mazda CX-80
SsangYong Rexton
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Rexton @ SsangYong Motor / KG Mobility

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
41100 - 51300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
8.20 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2145 - 2180 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4850 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1825 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1806 - 1977 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.60 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2157 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2021 - 2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
SsangYong

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Jeep Grand Cherokee
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Jeep Grand Cherokee or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus RX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and Toyota RAV4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.