VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Skoda Enyaq?

Mazda MX-30 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda MX-30 is moderately cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 504 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is slightly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 225 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 235 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries clearly more – 526 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Mazda MX-30
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the roomy, no-nonsense EV SUV that puts practicality and bang‑for‑buck front and centre, while the VW ID.7 Touring is a sleek, aerodynamic estate that prioritises range and motorway comfort — sensible family hauler versus long‑distance specialist. Buy the Enyaq for space, …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Mazda MX-30
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.