Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQA vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (292 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (44200 £ vs 41900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Skoda Enyaq?
EQA
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Enyaq has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2323 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 587 km, about 26 km more than the Mercedes EQA.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a slightly edge – offering 340 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls noticeable stronger with 679 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.
EQA
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes EQA is minimal lighter – 2045 kg compared to 2179 kg. The difference is around 134 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers decisively more room – 585 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 245 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – up to 1710 L, which is about 390 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq a bit takes the win – 489 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Skoda Enyaq
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
Price
41900 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4463 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1834 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.