Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQE SUV vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (625 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (71600 £ vs 41900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE SUV or Skoda Enyaq?
EQE SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Enyaq has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29639 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes EQE SUV with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE SUV performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 611 km, about 24 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV has a significantly edge – offering 625 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQE SUV performs evident better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE SUV pulls distinct stronger with 950 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 271 Nm difference.
EQE SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is slightly lighter – 2179 kg compared to 2440 kg. The difference is around 261 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers to a small extent more room – 585 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs slight better – up to 1710 L, which is about 35 L more than the Mercedes EQE SUV.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQE SUV slightly takes the win – 580 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQE SUV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQE SUV
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £71,600
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes EQE SUV
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Mercedes EQE SUV
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
71600 - 125100 £
|
Price
41900 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2440 - 2615 kg
|
Curb weight
2179 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4863 - 4879 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1940 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1672 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1620 - 1621 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1675 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 580 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE SUV?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.