Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Toyota C-HR+ - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (122 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 36000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Toyota C-HR+?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQT has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8217 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota C-HR+: with 13.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s decisively more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 6.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ performs significantly better – achieving up to 607 km, about 329 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ has a convincingly edge – offering 343 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 221 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.20 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 7.40 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota C-HR+ pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 338 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 93 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is barely noticeable lighter – 1810 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers clearly perceptible more room – 551 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 135 L.
When it comes to payload, Toyota C-HR+ to a small extent takes the win – 655 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 124 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR+ sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,000
Toyota C-HR+
Mercedes EQT
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.
details
Mercedes EQT
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
36000 - 46300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
1810 - 2010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
416 L
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1870 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
550 - 655 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.