VS

Mercedes GLC vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (472 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (50,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLC or Toyota C-HR+?

Mercedes GLC vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR+ is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Mercedes GLC costs 50,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,336 £.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 479 km more than the Mercedes GLC.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC offers noticeably more power – delivering 472 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLC delivers clearly more torque with 750 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 412 Nm more.

GLC

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is very slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,985 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers markedly more boot space – 620 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 204 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries moderately more – 655 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota bZ4X delivers serene electric driving, a spacious, tech-forward cabin and genuine zero-emissions appeal, while the Toyota C-HR+ packages Toyota’s clever hybrid economy into a sharper, more affordable crossover with punchy urban manners. Choose the bZ4X if you want EV range and futuristic …
Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Mercedes GLC
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes GLC

The Mercedes GLC blends plush cabin comfort and composed road manners into an SUV that feels more grown-up than it looks. It won’t shout for attention, but will quietly please buyers who want refinement, usable space and a touch of luxury without the drama.

details
22C0270_060
22C0270_055
22C0270_051
22C0270_046
22C0270_031

Reviews Mercedes GLC

4.4 (11 Reviews)
rate
Zede
10 May 2026, 20:12:35

Too expensive! To justify it with technology that's equal or inferior.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
2 Jan 2026, 18:32:30

There’s something about a Mercedes — you have to take it for a spin to feel it and understand why it’s special.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ mixes sharp, coupe-like styling with comfortable, surprisingly practical packaging, making a bold statement around town and on the weekend run. It’s aimed at drivers who value standout looks and fuss-free ownership over sports-car thrills, so if you want personality and reliability in one tidy package, book a test drive.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In this head-to-head, the Škoda Elroq squares up against the quirky Toyota C-HR+, pitting Škoda’s roomy, sensible practicality against Toyota’s bold looks and city-savvy efficiency. Which one deserves your money and garage space — the value-packed family hauler or the personality-packed crossover …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
In one corner: the Tesla Model Y — the electric SUV that turned long-range EVs and futuristic tech into everyday normal, complete with ludicrously quick acceleration and a touchscreen for everything. In the other: the Toyota C-HR+ — a sharply styled, clever little crossover that prefers fuel …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the posher C-HR+ share the same eye-catching coupe‑SUV shape, but one is aimed at shoppers after clever practicality while the other courts buyers wanting a bit more kit and a touch of swagger. We line them up to see whether the C-HR+’s extra toys justify the price bump — or if …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
VW ID.4
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the VW ID.4 and the Toyota C-HR+ sets an electric compact SUV against a fuel-efficient compact crossover, so your decision comes down to whether you want a pure-EV experience or practical economy and distinctive styling. This quick comparison highlights the ID.4’s electric range, charging …
Kia EV4 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The electric Kia EV4 Hatchback — slick, tech-packed and built for range-minded commutes — goes head-to-head with the quirky, style-first Toyota C‑HR+, a compact crossover that favours personality and frugal running costs. By the end of this DriveDuel showdown we’ll tell you which one deserves your …
Mercedes GLC
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
50,300 - 82,100 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
122 - 128 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 214 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,985 - 2,400 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 - 1,920 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 - 575 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
186 - 472 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 750 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
137 - 347 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 - 2,999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B, E, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Toyota
Is the Mercedes GLC offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.