VS

Mercedes GLE vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (585 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (78,900 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLE or Toyota C-HR+?

Mercedes GLE vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Mercedes GLE

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLE

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Mercedes GLE costs 78,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 42,921 £.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers substantially more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 503 km more than the Mercedes GLE.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLE offers significantly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 242 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLE is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLE delivers substantially more torque with 750 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 412 Nm more.

GLE

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is visibly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 580 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes GLE offers markedly more boot space – 655 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 239 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes GLE carries moderately more – 770 kg compared to 655 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to whether you prioritise compact practicality and efficiency or a bolder, more stylised driving experience. I’ll compare their space, ride, economy, tech and ownership costs so you can see which one fits your daily needs and …
Mercedes GLE
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes GLE

The Mercedes GLE blends luxurious comfort with a confident road presence, wrapping tech and refinement in an SUV shape that still knows how to behave on a twisty back road. Inside it's plush and quiet, with clever storage and driver aids that make long trips effortless — plus the badge gives it that easy-to-respect curb appeal.

details
18C0625_033
18C0625_078
18C0625_137
18C0625_003

Reviews Mercedes GLE

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Andreas
7 Jun 2026, 08:43:32

Mercedes is completely superior to Volvo, which feels plasticky and noisy with poor fit and finish, a poor tactile feel in the controls and a lack of buttons.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Victor
10 Apr 2026, 07:46:13

I just love Benz cars

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Krzysztof
17 Jun 2026, 07:19:28

More comfortable
Visually bigger and nicer
Low energy consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
VW ID.3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison pits the Volkswagen ID.3 — a compact, all-electric hatch — against the Toyota C-HR+ — a stylish compact crossover often offered with hybrid powertrains — to help you decide between pure-electric driving and crossover practicality. If you want low running costs, instant torque and a …
BMW iX1
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The BMW iX1 and the Toyota C‑HR+ represent two very different takes on the compact crossover: the iX1 delivers BMW’s premium electric driving experience, refinement and latest tech, while the C‑HR+ emphasizes bold styling, hybrid efficiency and everyday practicality. Choose the iX1 if you …
Tesla Model 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Tesla Model 3 and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to whether you prefer an efficient, high-tech electric sedan or a compact, style-focused crossover. The Model 3 stands out for electric range, sharp performance and advanced driver-assist features, while the Toyota C‑HR (commonly …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Volvo EX40
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison pits the Volvo EX40 against the Toyota C-HR to help you decide whether a compact premium electric SUV or a stylish, efficient compact crossover better fits your needs. I'll focus on driving range and performance, interior quality and tech, running costs and practicality so you can …
Mercedes GLE
Volvo XC90
VS
In the competitive luxury SUV segment, the Mercedes GLE and Volvo XC90 stand out for their distinctive qualities. The GLE impresses with its dynamic performance and cutting-edge technology, offering an engaging driving experience, while the XC90 enchants with its Scandinavian design and commitment …
Mercedes GLE
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
78,900 - 115,800 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
3.2 - 10.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
91 - 104 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
72 - 241 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,815 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
485 - 655 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,010 - 2,018 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
495 - 770 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
309 - 585 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
560 - 750 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
227 - 430 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
2,989 - 2,999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mercedes GLE?

The Mercedes GLE is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.