VS

Volvo EX40 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (45,200 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Toyota C-HR+?

Volvo EX40 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

EX40

Head-to-head: Volvo EX40 and Toyota C-HR+ in one glance

Volvo EX40 and Toyota C-HR+ present two distinct answers to the compact crossover question, which makes the Volvo EX40 VS Toyota C-HR+ matchup a useful exercise for buyers deciding between calm luxury and pragmatic efficiency. The Volvo EX40 leans into a composed, quiet cabin and a travel-ready demeanor, while the Toyota C-HR+ prioritises low running costs, bold styling and a usable hybrid system for everyday commuting. Pricing and how you use the car matter here: the EX40 sits at the premium end, the C-HR+ rewards routine charging and frugal driving. Read on to understand which car suits long motorway days, city chores or family practicality best.

C-HR+

Character and driving feel

The Volvo EX40 drives with measured poise: heavier steering, a planted ride and a focus on effortless cruising rather than sporting thrills, whereas the Toyota C-HR+ feels more city‑oriented — nimble, responsive in town and engineered to extract economy from everyday driving. If you value quiet, torque-rich shove for relaxed overtakes and a sense of solidity on the motorway, the EX40 leans in that direction. If you spend most time in urban traffic, want immediate electric‑assist feel and a car that masks consumption well, the C‑HR+ will feel livelier and more rewarding. The trade-off is simple: the EX40 trades some agility for serenity; the C‑HR+ trades some long‑leg calm for punchy, efficient urban manners.

EX40

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On long runs the Volvo EX40 stands out for its seating comfort and low cabin noise, making multi‑hour motorway stints noticeably less tiring than in the Toyota C‑HR+. The EX40’s seats and sound insulation create a relaxed cocoon, while the Toyota C‑HR+ is comfortable enough but reveals its compromises at sustained high speeds and under strong accelerations when drivetrain noise becomes apparent. For buyers who prioritise seat ergonomics and a composed ride on highways, the EX40 will feel like the better companion; for those whose long trips are intermittent and value fuel efficiency, the C‑HR+ still manages highway miles very efficiently. Both cars cope well with cruise and driver aids, but the EX40’s overall serenity tips the balance toward long-distance comfort.

C-HR+

Practicality, cabin usability and family suitability

Everyday practicality splits these two: the Volvo EX40 offers a clever luggage area and added frunk space that make loading and organising family gear easier, while the Toyota C‑HR+ pays for its hybrid packaging with a noticeably smaller and less forgiving boot. Rear‑seat occupants will generally be happier in the EX40 thanks to better headroom and a less claustrophobic cabin, whereas the C‑HR+’s coupe‑like roofline and narrower openings can make child seats and taller passengers feel cramped. If you regularly carry luggage, pushchairs or adult passengers, the EX40’s usable layout is the more accommodating choice; if your life revolves around two people, city runs and maximising economy, the C‑HR+ remains a convincing option despite its tighter load space.

EX40

City friendliness, tech and everyday usability

In town the Toyota C‑HR+ shines with compact dimensions, instant hybrid/electric take‑off and straightforward, tactile controls that make parking and short hops easy and efficient. The Volvo EX40 is also city‑friendly — with gentle steering, one‑pedal options and intuitive driver aids — but its large touchscreen and occasional software quirks can intrude on quick interactions. Visibility is a shared concern: both cars benefit from camera systems to offset limited rear sightlines, though the EX40’s parking ergonomics feel slightly more composed once you get used to the view. Put simply, the C‑HR+ feels like the sharper urban tool and the EX40 like a more relaxed, tech‑heavy commuter with a few extra caveats around infotainment polish.

C-HR+

Which buyer fits which car — a practical wrap that leads into the numbers

If your priority is serene cabin comfort, motorway composure and a practical, well‑laid‑out interior, the Volvo EX40 will appeal more to comfort‑focused commuters and small families who accept a higher purchase price for everyday refinement. If you prioritise low running costs, bold styling, city agility and intuitive controls — and can live with a smaller boot and tighter rear space — the Toyota C‑HR+ answers those needs efficiently. The decision comes down to usage patterns: choose the EX40 for long motorway miles and passenger comfort, choose the C‑HR+ for dense urban driving and economy. Below you’ll find the technical comparison to clarify how power, range, consumption and payload translate those character differences into measurable trade‑offs.

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Toyota C-HR+ is visibly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,257 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is visibly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 3.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 31 km more than the Volvo EX40.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 343 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Toyota C-HR+ takes 5.2 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers clearly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 332 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 230 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR+ offers barely more boot space – 416 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 6 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries noticeably more – 655 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km
details
Volvo EX40
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Volvo EX40
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX40 have?

The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.