VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Suzuki S-Cross?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki S-Cross is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers clearly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 265 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Suzuki S-Cross offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is substantially lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 1,170 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers clearly more boot space – 670 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 240 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 245 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki S-Cross is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
S-Cross

Suzuki S-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
serpimg_rTvtWU

Reviews Mercedes Marco Polo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Suzuki S-Cross is about whether you want rugged simplicity and great value or a more refined, comfortable compact crossover. This comparison will focus on real-world space, economy, driving feel and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
Suzuki S-Cross and Dacia Bigster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Suzuki S-Cross or the …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross stands out with its avant-garde design and customizable features, making it an attractive choice for those seeking flair and personalization. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more traditional aesthetic but compensates with robust performance and advanced safety …
Mercedes Marco Polo
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Marco Polo?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.