VS

MG MG3 vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (194 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Ford Puma?

MG MG3 vs Ford Puma: Key differences

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • marginally lighter

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

MG3

Ford Puma vs MG MG3: A Clash of Titans

The automotive market continues to evolve, offering consumers a plethora of choices in their quest for the perfect vehicle. In this comparison, we delve into two intriguing contenders: the Ford Puma, an energetic SUV, and the MG MG3, a practical hatchback. While they serve different purposes, both vehicles present appealing features that cater to both performance and efficiency. Let’s explore the technical aspects and innovations that set these two models apart.

Puma

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Starting with the Ford Puma, it delivers a range of power options, featuring petrol engines with mild hybrid technology and even full electric variants. The Puma’s engines produce between 125 to 168 horsepower, with 0-100 km/h acceleration times ranging from a commendable 7.4 seconds to 9.8 seconds. The fuel consumption varies between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, while the electric variant operates at a consumption rate of 13.1-13.7 kWh/100km. This impressive efficiency is complemented by an electric range of up to 376 km.

On the other hand, the MG MG3 boasts a relatively straightforward engine offering a petrol unit producing 116 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 8 seconds. While it may not match the Puma in raw performance, the MG3 excels in fuel economy, consuming just 4.4 L/100km. For those seeking a balance between efficiency and power, the MG3 presents a compelling argument.

MG3

Transmissions and Drivability

The transmissions available in both vehicles also reflect their design ethos. The Ford Puma can be equipped with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing drivers with a choice based on their preferences for control or convenience. Front-wheel drive is standard, ensuring a sporty feel on the road, accompanied by a range of torque outputs from 170 to 290 Nm.

The MG MG3 comes with an automatic transmission option alongside the manual gearbox, offering simplicity and ease of use. With a curb weight of 1285kg, it is lightweight compared to the Puma, which ranges from 1316 to 1563kg depending on the variant. This weight difference contributes to the MG3’s nimble handling and enhanced efficiency.

Puma

Size, Comfort, and Practicality

When it comes to dimensions, the Ford Puma stands out with a length of 4186 mm to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity between 456 and 523 liters, offering ample space for passengers and cargo alike. Its SUV body style and higher ride height provide an elevated driving position, appealing to those who crave a more commanding presence on the road.

In contrast, the MG MG3, while shorter at 4113 mm, still manages to provide comfortable seating for five passengers but falls short in trunk space with only 293 liters. However, its compact hatchback design makes it an excellent option for city driving and parking in tight spaces.

MG3

Innovations and Technology

Both models are equipped with modern technology, focusing on driver comfort and connectivity. The Ford Puma is packed with Ford's latest infotainment systems, including smartphone integration and advanced safety features such as automatic emergency braking. Moreover, its MHEV technology ensures that drivers can enjoy improved efficiency without sacrificing performance.

The MG MG3 also offers a generous suite of tech features, such as a user-friendly infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and decent safety ratings. Its design ethos focuses more on delivering value-for-money features rather than cutting-edge technology. This positioning makes the MG3 a significant player in the entry-level hatchback market.

Puma

Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?

In the battle of the Ford Puma vs. the MG MG3, the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference and needs. The Ford Puma is ideal for those seeking an efficient and energetic SUV with advanced technology and ample space. Meanwhile, the MG MG3 appeals strongly to urban drivers in need of a practical and budget-friendly hatchback.

Both vehicles have distinct advantages, and whether you align more with Ford’s innovative approach or MG’s value-driven design, you can’t go wrong with either choice in your journey toward finding the perfect car.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MG3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,494 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers moderately more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers considerably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

MG3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is marginally lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG MG3 has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £15,400
MG3

MG MG3

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 194 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
details
MG MG3
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
MG MG3
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive hatchback segment, the MG3 and Vauxhall Corsa both offer attractive options for budget-conscious drivers. The MG3 stands out with its bold styling and surprisingly spacious interior, while the Vauxhall Corsa brings refined driving dynamics and advanced infotainment options to the …
MG MG3
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
373 - 448 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
MG
Brand
Ford
What drive types are available for the MG MG3?

The MG MG3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.