Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Ford Puma?
MINI Aceman vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,086 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is very slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.1 kWh/100km for the MINI Aceman. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers moderately more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 62 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers noticeably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers a bit more torque with 350 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers considerably more boot space – 523 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 223 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries slightly more – 530 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
MINI Aceman
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.