VS

MINI Countryman vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (313 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (30,100 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Countryman or Ford Ranger?

MINI Countryman vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

Ford Ranger

  • considerably more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Countryman

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MINI Countryman is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,100 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,354 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 5.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the MINI Countryman offers significantly more range – reaching up to 497 km, about 455 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers moderately more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 203 Nm more.

Countryman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Countryman is significantly lighter – 1,570 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 835 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries substantially more – 989 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 489 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Countryman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
Countryman

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 463 - 497 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
MINI Countryman
VS
Kia's fresh EV3 goes head-to-head with the MINI Countryman in a fight that contrasts pragmatic electric range and modern tech with charismatic style and all‑round versatility. We compare space, equipment, driving feel and ownership costs to find which one earns its place in your garage.
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MINI Countryman
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr

Reviews MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Urszula
13 Apr 2026, 06:42:12

Beautiful design, carefully finished inside, large display, very comfortable ride with the automatic gearbox, a bit cramped in the back, fairly spacious boot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX1
MINI Countryman
VS
Deciding between the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman? This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on what matters—interior space, driving dynamics, efficiency and running costs—so you can choose whether the iX1’s electric sophistication or the Countryman’s flexible character fits your life …
MINI Countryman
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle between the MINI Countryman and the VW ID.3, drivers can expect a clash of style and innovation. The Countryman offers a distinctive blend of retro charm and practicality, making it a favorite for those who appreciate iconic design. Meanwhile, the ID.3 stands out with its fully …
MINI Countryman
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the MINI Countryman and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value the Countryman's premium, sporty feel or the Elroq's roomy practicality and value. This comparison highlights the real-world differences in driving character, interior space, equipment and running costs to help …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Ford Explorer EV
MINI Countryman
VS
The all-new Ford Explorer EV emerges as a formidable contender in the electric SUV market, offering impressive range and spacious interiors, ideal for family adventures. On the other hand, the MINI Countryman, now with an electrified twist, charms with its iconic design and agile handling, making …
MINI Countryman
VW T-Roc
VS
In the bustling compact crossover segment, the MINI Countryman and VW T-Roc both sharpen their competitive edges with distinctive flair and functional versatility. The Countryman charms with its iconic British styling and go-kart-like handling, making every drive a spirited affair. Meanwhile, the …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
The Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-30
MINI Countryman
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the MINI Countryman is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MINI Countryman
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,100 - 39,800 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 149 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,843 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 - 500 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
MINI
Brand
Ford
What drive types are available for the MINI Countryman?

The MINI Countryman is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.