Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Countryman vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (313 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (31500 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Countryman or Skoda Enyaq?
Countryman
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MINI Countryman has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 31500 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6515 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 15.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.90 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs noticeable better – achieving up to 587 km, about 125 km more than the MINI Countryman.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a barely noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Countryman performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls evident stronger with 679 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Countryman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Countryman is distinct lighter – 1620 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 382 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more room – 585 L compared to 505 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs somewhat better – up to 1710 L, which is about 180 L more than the MINI Countryman.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq minimal takes the win – 509 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
MINI Countryman
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
MINI Countryman
The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
MINI Countryman
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
31500 - 45300 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
432 - 462 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
64.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1620 - 2075 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4444 - 4447 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1843 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1635 - 1661 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1450 - 1530 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 500 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 313 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
120 - 230 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the MINI Countryman?
The MINI Countryman is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.