VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Skoda Enyaq?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi ASX is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,086 £.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 434 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is significantly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 778 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more boot space – 585 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Mitsubishi ASX
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Quick comparison between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which fits your needs. Note: I don’t find any official Skoda model called “Epiq” — did you mean the Skoda Kamiq, Kodiaq, or another Škoda model?
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.4
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 are sibling electric SUVs built on the same MEB platform, but each offers a distinct take on design, interior space and feature packaging. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Enyaq’s emphasis on practicality and roominess or the ID.4’s more familiar …
Mitsubishi ASX
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.