Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (218 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Skoda Enyaq?
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
Eclipse Cross
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is barely cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 780 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers barely more range – reaching up to 635 km, about 48 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.
Eclipse Cross
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more boot space – 585 L compared to 487 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
635 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
487 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,489 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,908 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.