Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (218 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Skoda Enyaq?
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Eclipse Cross
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers barely more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 38 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.
Eclipse Cross
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is marginally lighter – 1,922 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 152 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers only slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries visibly more – 526 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,908 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
385 - 413 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.