VS

Nissan Interstar vs Peugeot 408 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 240 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Peugeot 408?

Nissan Interstar vs Peugeot 408: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

details

Peugeot 408

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot 408 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,042 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 408 uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 4.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Peugeot 408 offers moderately more range – reaching up to 456 km, about 46 km more than the Nissan Interstar.

408

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 408 offers markedly more power – delivering 240 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 70 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers very slightly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Peugeot 408 offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is noticeably lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 509 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 456 kg. That’s a difference of about 991 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot 408 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £35,100
408

Peugeot 408

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 240 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 79 - 456 km
Nissan Interstar
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details

Peugeot 408

The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.

details
Nissan Interstar
Peugeot 408

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
410 km
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 205 g/km
co2
0 - 114 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
Payload
371 - 456 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Peugeot
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.