VS

Nissan Interstar vs Renault Symbioz comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (36,200 £ vs 24,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Renault Symbioz?

Nissan Interstar vs Renault Symbioz: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

  • very slightly more power
details

Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Symbioz is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,474 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

Symbioz

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers very slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Symbioz offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is significantly lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 694 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 988 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Interstar is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,200
Interstar

Nissan Interstar

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 130 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 410 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
serpimg_9dGXeC

Reviews Nissan Interstar

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Symbioz
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a straight fight between Renault’s dreamy Symbioz and Dacia’s pragmatic Bigster, the Symbioz seduces with living‑room luxury and sci‑fi tech while the Bigster scores on honest space, rugged bones and a price tag you can actually imagine. If you want a show‑stopping concept that imagines the …
Peugeot 3008
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Peugeot 3008 and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different takes on modern motoring: the 3008 is a production compact SUV known for its practicality and refined interior, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward‑looking concept showcasing electric, autonomous and connected technologies. …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Symbioz
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai with the Renault Symbioz highlights a clash between a proven compact crossover and Renault's forward-looking Symbioz concept that showcases the brand's electric and connected ambitions. This comparison will focus on how they differ in design, practicality and technology …
Renault Symbioz
VW T-Roc
VS
Comparing the Renault Symbioz and the Volkswagen T‑Roc pits Renault's Symbioz concept — a forward-looking electric and autonomous showcase — against the T‑Roc, Volkswagen's practical compact crossover for everyday use. This short comparison will help you decide whether you're drawn to cutting-edge …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Nissan Interstar
Renault Symbioz

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
410 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 205 g/km
co2
102 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
Payload
455 - 459 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
Is the Nissan Interstar offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.