VS

Nissan Leaf vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (217 HP vs 224 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Leaf or Omoda 5?

Nissan Leaf vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Nissan Leaf

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • barely more power
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Leaf

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Nissan Leaf costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,043 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Nissan Leaf is moderately more efficient: consuming 13.7 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Omoda 5. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Leaf offers visibly more range – reaching up to 624 km, about 194 km more than the Omoda 5.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers barely more power – delivering 224 HP compared to 217 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.6 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Leaf delivers marginally more torque with 355 Nm compared to 340 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Leaf

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Omoda 5 is a bit lighter – 1,621 kg compared to 1,864 kg. The difference is around 243 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Leaf offers slightly more boot space – 437 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.

When it comes to payload, the Omoda 5 carries slightly more – 536 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Leaf has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,800
Leaf

Nissan Leaf

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 176 - 217 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 13.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 436 - 624 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Omoda 5
BYD Atto 2
VS
The Omoda 5 and BYD Atto 2 are eye-catching compact crossovers that compete on modern styling, tech-packed cabins and strong value for money. This quick comparison will show how they differ in space, equipment, driving character and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your priorities.
Nissan Leaf
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Leaf

The Nissan Leaf is a practical, easygoing electric hatch that turns daily commutes into a quiet, effortless affair while offering more cabin space than it lets on. It’s a sensible, wallet-friendly step into electrification for buyers who value comfort and simplicity over sporty drama, though those chasing long-distance thrills might look elsewhere.

details
Nissan_Leaf_High.1.JPG-source
Nissan_Leaf_High.13.JPG-source
Nissan_Leaf_2022_18.JPG-source
Nissan_Leaf_2022_4.JPG-source

Reviews Nissan Leaf

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Mir
12 Mar 2026, 21:05:00

The author of this comparison probably doesn't read what they're writing. Almost 100 Nm is a small difference? XD And by the way, the Leaf is listed at 6.9 s to the first 100 km/h while the rival is over 8 s — that's not a small difference… it's a shame to read this comparison with so many mistakes; better to take a drive and judge for yourself.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 is a stylish compact crossover that catches the eye with a bold, contemporary look and a tech-forward cabin. It offers a comfortable ride and a surprisingly spacious interior, making it a practical yet distinctive choice for buyers who want modern features and solid value.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pablo
8 May 2026, 07:59:00

Fantastic. It would be great to have a bit more battery capacity and a higher DC charging speed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Hyundai Tucson
Omoda 5
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and the Omoda 5 are two compact SUVs that appeal to buyers seeking practicality with distinct personalities — Tucson for proven dependability, Omoda 5 for sharp styling and tech-focused features. This comparison will pinpoint how they differ in space, equipment, driving feel and …
Omoda 5
Leapmotor B10
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Leapmotor B10 both promise modern design and advanced tech, but they take different approaches to powertrain, packaging and driving character. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each model wins — in comfort, range/efficiency, equipment and overall value — …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 3008
VS
Comparing the Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 3008 pits a bold, value-focused newcomer against a more established, refined compact SUV with a stronger brand pedigree. I’ll walk you through the key differences in design, driving dynamics, practicality and features so you can decide which suits your needs …
Hyundai Kona
Omoda 5
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Omoda 5 pits a familiar, well-rounded compact crossover against a newer, tech-focused challenger offering bold styling and generous equipment. This comparison will help you weigh Kona’s proven driving dynamics and brand familiarity against Omoda 5’s …
Omoda 5
Peugeot 2008
VS
The Omoda 5 and the Peugeot 2008 are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want stylish urban SUVs with modern tech—Omoda 5 focuses on bold design and strong equipment-for-the-price, while the 2008 leans on European refinement and sharper handling. This comparison will help you decide whether you …
Dacia Duster
Omoda 5
VS
The Dacia Duster and Omoda 5 are compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Duster prioritizes rugged practicality, simplicity and low running costs, while the Omoda 5 leans on bold styling, tech-rich cabins and a more refined on-road feel. This quick comparison will help you decide whether …
Nissan Leaf
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 41,100 £
Price
24,800 - 31,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
436 - 624 km
Electric Range
430 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 120 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,864 - 1,956 kg
Curb weight
1,621 - 1,710 kg
Trunk capacity
437 L
Trunk capacity
300 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,810 mm
Width
1,824 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
441 - 444 kg
Payload
431 - 536 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
176 - 217 HP
Power HP
204 - 224 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
345 - 355 Nm
Torque
295 - 340 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
150 - 165 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Nissan Leaf?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.