VS

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo EX40 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (24,800 £ vs 45,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 2008 or Volvo EX40?

Peugeot 2008 vs Volvo EX40: Key differences

Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • considerably lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2008

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Peugeot 2008 is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,486 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 2008 is barely more efficient: consuming 15.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 1.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 171 km more than the Peugeot 2008.

EX40

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers substantially more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 286 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Peugeot 2008 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers significantly more torque with 670 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

2008

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 2008 is considerably lighter – 1,263 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 777 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Peugeot 2008 offers barely more boot space – 434 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries very slightly more – 480 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Peugeot 2008
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot 2008

The Peugeot 2008 is a compact crossover that blends sharp French styling with a practical, high-riding layout, giving it more presence and versatility than a typical small hatchback. Inside it offers a clever, user-friendly cabin with sensible storage and modern infotainment, while a composed ride and efficient powertrains make it well suited to both city errands and longer journeys.

details
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_021_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_026_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906PC_121_klein
PEUGEOT_2008_1906STYP_300_0

Reviews Peugeot 2008

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
Peugeot 2008
Peugeot 308
VS
Deciding between the Peugeot 2008 and the Peugeot 308 comes down to lifestyle: the 2008 is a compact crossover that prioritises higher ride height, practicality and urban versatility, while the 308 is a sharper compact hatchback focused on driving dynamics and efficiency. If you need space, …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Opel Frontera
Peugeot 2008
VS
If you want unashamedly rugged, the Opel Frontera still wears its rough‑and‑ready off‑road badge with chunky looks and simple, go‑anywhere mechanics, whereas the Peugeot 2008 plays the smarter, city‑first crossover with sleek styling and the tech you actually use every day. Pick the Frontera for …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you want a compact electric SUV that emphasizes BMW’s sporty, driver-focused dynamics or one that prioritizes Volvo’s calm, safety-minded comfort. Both deliver premium EV credentials, but they differ in ride character, interior …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Peugeot 2008
VW T-Roc
VS
This comparison pits the Peugeot 2008 against the VW T‑Roc to help you choose between a stylish, city-friendly compact SUV and a more conventional, solidly built German alternative. I’ll compare driving dynamics, interior quality, practicality and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Peugeot 2008
Volvo EX40

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,800 - 40,400 £
Price
45,200 - 56,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
405 km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,263 - 1,623 kg
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Trunk capacity
434 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,770 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
407 - 447 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Peugeot 2008?

The Peugeot 2008 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.