Compare performance (240 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 408 or Volvo EX30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive market, the competition between electric vehicles is fiercer than ever. Today, we dive into a comparison between two contenders in the SUV segment: the elegant Peugeot 408 and the trailblazing Volvo EX30. Both promise cutting-edge technology and eco-friendliness, but which one stands out?
The Peugeot 408, with its length of 4687 mm and width of 1848 mm, exudes an aura of modern sophistication. Its height of 1478 mm allows for a sleek silhouette without compromising on space. Meanwhile, the Volvo EX30 is more compact, measuring 4233 mm in length, 1837 mm in width, and standing slightly taller at 1549 mm. This allows the EX30 to offer a nimble city-driving experience.
When it comes to powertrains, the Peugeot 408 offers a versatile selection, including petrol, hybrid, and electric options. The electric model delivers up to 214 HP with a 58.2 kWh battery, while the PHEV variant boasts 225 HP. The 408’s electric variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 7.2 seconds.
Volvo’s EX30, being purely electric, doesn’t hold back on power. Its RWD version offers 272 HP, while the AWD version delivers an impressive 428 HP. The high-performance EX30 can achieve 0-100 km/h in a blistering 3.6 seconds, showcasing Volvo’s commitment to electric prowess.
Efficiency is a crucial metric in the electric vehicle market. The Peugeot 408 electric model offers a consumption rate of 15.1 kWh/100 km and can cover up to 453 km on a single charge. Its plug-in hybrid option further optimizes fuel consumption with just 1.5 L/100 km.
Volvo's EX30 offers different models with electric ranges varying between 339 km and a substantial 476 km, with an energy consumption ranging from 17 to 18.7 kWh/100 km. Volvo focuses heavily on maximizing driving range, ensuring less time stationed at the charging points.
Both vehicles push the envelope in terms of technological innovation. The Peugeot 408 integrates eco-friendly production with advanced driving aids and a seamless dual-clutch automatic transmission for smooth operation. Its plug-in hybrid version brings the best of both worlds, combining petrol efficiency with electric power.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 is a tech marvel, equipped with a reduction gearbox and available in RWD and AWD, optimizing traction and handling. The EX30 is built to be both futuristic and sustainable, with cutting-edge efficiency that complements Volvo’s dedication to safety and environmental responsibility.
The Peugeot 408 and Volvo EX30 each carry a unique appeal, potentially swaying buyers depending on their lifestyle and preferences. The 408 shines with its drivetrain versatility and stylish design, while the EX30 stands out with its raw electric power and advanced technological features. Whether you value groundbreaking performance or versatile efficiency, both SUVs cater to a modern eco-conscious driver’s needs. The final decision lies with you, the discerning car enthusiast.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo EX30 is moderately cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Peugeot 408 costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,126 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Peugeot 408 is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.7 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 19 km more than the Peugeot 408.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers significantly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 240 HP. That’s roughly 188 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Peugeot 408 takes 7.2 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers markedly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 183 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot 408 is slightly lighter – 1,544 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 296 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 408 carries moderately more – 456 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
The Volvo EX30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot 408 blends a coupe-like roofline with practical sensibility, delivering striking looks and a surprisingly airy, premium-feeling cabin. On the road it prefers comfort and poise over manic thrills, making it a smart, stylish choice for buyers who want something a bit different from the usual family hatchback.
details
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 48,000 £
|
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
79 - 456 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 114 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,544 - 1,879 kg
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
371 - 456 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 240 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 9.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
107 - 176 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España