Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Peugeot 5008 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (325 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (39,300 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot 5008 or Ford Puma?
Peugeot 5008 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
5008
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot 5008 costs 39,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,394 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Peugeot 5008 uses 2.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Peugeot 5008. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 5008 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 669 km, about 252 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 5008 offers clearly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 5008 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 5008 delivers clearly more torque with 511 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.
5008
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Peugeot 5008 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,700 kg. The difference is around 384 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 348 L. That’s a difference of about 175 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot 5008 carries clearly more – 640 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 171 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Peugeot 5008 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,300
Peugeot 5008
Peugeot 5008
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Peugeot 5008
The Peugeot 5008 blends Peugeot's sharp design with the space and versatility families actually need, wrapping clever packaging and a premium-feeling cabin in a crisp, SUV-like silhouette. It drives with more poise than you'd expect from a people carrier, serves up practical touches and flexible seating for everyday chaos, and still looks good when parked outside the school gates.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Peugeot 5008
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,300 - 54,300 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
78 - 669 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 127 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,700 - 2,344 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
294 - 348 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
596 - 640 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.