Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Skoda Enyaq?
Renault Arkana vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,457 £.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 474 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is substantially lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 669 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries only slightly more – 489 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £41,900
Skoda Enyaq
Renault Arkana
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Renault Arkana
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.