Compare performance (200 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Audi Q3?
When it comes to choosing a versatile SUV, the Audi Q3 and Renault Austral are two strong contenders in the field. Both bring their unique strengths to the table, but how do they compare when pitted directly against each other? Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these models apart.
The 2024 Audi Q3 offers a range of engine options, with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 245 HP. Available in both petrol and diesel variants with different configurations, the Q3 offers a blend of manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions alongside front-wheel and all-wheel drive options. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be as swift as 5.8 seconds, depending on the variant. Coupled with a robust torque output reaching up to 400 Nm, the Q3 clearly demonstrates a focus on performance.
Comparatively, the Renault Austral provides a more environmentally conscientious option with its petrol MHEV and full hybrid powertrains. It delivers a maximum of 200 HP with an acceleration time of 8.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h. The Renault Austral is strictly front-wheel drive and offers a unique approach with a CVT automatic gearbox, prioritizing efficiency with a commendable maximum torque of 270 Nm.
In terms of fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 varies from 5.5 L/100km to 8.5 L/100km, while its CO2 emissions range between 143 to 193 g/km. The Q3's diverse range of configurations broadens choice for those who may prioritize efficiency alongside power.
The Renault Austral stands out with a lower fuel consumption of 4.7 L/100km and emissions as low as 105 g/km in its hybrid option, reflecting its strong stance on eco-friendliness, thanks to its advanced hybrid technology. For those prioritizing a greener drive, the Austral makes a compelling case.
Dimension-wise, the Renault Austral is slightly longer at 4510 mm compared to the Audi Q3's 4500 mm. However, the Q3 does offer a slightly wider and taller build. Both models comfortably seat five passengers and feature five doors. In terms of trunk space, the Q3 takes the lead with a trunk capacity of 530 L, compared to the Austral's 500 L or 430 L, making it a slightly better option for those needing more cargo space.
Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technology and comfort features. Audi equips the Q3 with advanced infotainment systems, driver-assist technologies, and options for luxurious interiors, maintaining its reputation for offering premium experiences.
Renault, however, doesn't lag far behind. The Austral features advanced connectivity options and driver assistance systems while focusing keenly on providing a smooth, economical, and technology-friendly driving experience through its hybrid innovations.
The choice between the Audi Q3 and Renault Austral ultimately depends on what you value more in a vehicle. If you are searching for a high-performing SUV with a variety of configurations, the Audi Q3 offers versatility and power. However, if you are keen on an ecologically thoughtful driving experience with hybrid innovations, the Renault Austral could be the more desirable choice.
Both models offer unique features and capabilities, making this a tough choice for potential buyers. Either way, opting for either the Q3 or Austral ensures a ride that balances practicality with style and innovation.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Austral is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,314 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Austral with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is very slightly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Austral offers barely more boot space – 527 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries slightly more – 535 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
The Audi Q3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Audi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España