Compare performance (200 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (29,900 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Austral or Ford Explorer EV?
In an era where innovation meets necessity, two distinct paths of automotive evolution converge at the crossroads. The Ford Explorer EV and Renault Austral represent the present and future of automotive technology, each embodying unique visions of environmental responsibility and driving pleasure. Let’s dive into the dynamics of these SUVs to understand what sets them apart.
The Ford Explorer EV flaunts its electric prowess with multiple motor configurations, delivering power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower. The electric SUV offers a choice between rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, catering to diverse driving preferences. Accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds, the Explorer EV places emphasis on swift performance, all while ensuring zero emissions—thanks to its fully electric powertrain.
Conversely, the Renault Austral opts for a blend of traditional and modern with its petrol mild-hybrid and full hybrid engines. Available with power outputs of 158 to 200 horsepower, the Austral employs a front-wheel-drive layout. Its faster variant accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.4 seconds. Though slightly outpaced by its electric competitor, the Austral's hybrid systems emphasize fuel efficiency without sacrificing versatility.
The Ford Explorer EV showcases a compelling electric range, extending up to 602 kilometers—masters a perfect balance between performance and efficiency. With consumption figures between 13.9-16.6 kWh/100km, it is designed to cater to long-range explorers. Its zero CO2 emissions are the hallmark of its eco-friendly design, underscoring the brand's commitment to sustainability.
On the other hand, the Renault Austral focuses on a hybrid solution, offering average consumption as low as 4.7 L/100km with the full hybrid version. However, with CO2 emissions ranging from 105-139 g/km, it still contrasts against the EV’s zero-emission stance. The Austral compensates with an extensive fuel tank capacity that ensures fewer stops on longer journeys.
Both SUVs offer seating for five, but the Ford Explorer EV takes the lead with its sleek yet robust design, measuring 4468 mm in length and providing ample space with a trunk capacity reaching up to 450 liters. Though slightly heavier with a curb weight of 2090-2167 kg, its payload capacity peaks at 585 kg, emphasizing its practical utility.
The Renault Austral, standing a bit taller and longer, offers a trunk capacity between 430-500 liters, utilizing its dimensions of 4510 mm in length effectively. Although lighter at 1539-1592 kg, the Austral maintains a payload capability up to 509 kg.
Ford leads in driving innovation with the Explorer EV’s advanced electric systems and cutting-edge reduction gearbox, highlighting its intellectual drive toward electrification. The smooth delivery of power and responsive steering add sophistication to its technological arsenal.
Renault counters with the Austral’s adaptive hybrid technology and user-centric infotainment systems, blending tradition with modern gadgetry. While perhaps more conventional, its hybrid approach ensures a balanced technological leap catering to a broader audience.
While the Ford Explorer EV and Renault Austral cater to two different end goals—one towards complete electrification and the other towards a hybrid harmony—they stand as flagbearers of an evolving industry narrative. Both models showcase the ingenuity and drive toward sustainable automotive excellence, beckoning enthusiasts to a future where choice translates into a gift rather than a challenge.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Austral is somewhat cheaper – starting at 29,900 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,286 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Renault Austral takes 8.4 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Austral is markedly lighter – 1,548 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 448 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Austral offers slightly more boot space – 527 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 55 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries slightly more – 585 kg compared to 477 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
Price
34,200 - 48,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España