Compare performance (158 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, two names frequently rise above the noise: the 2024 Ford Puma and the Renault Captur. Both vehicles offer an enticing mix of style, innovation, and performance, destined to capture the hearts of city drivers and those embarking on adventurous getaways alike.
The Ford Puma and Renault Captur both sport a modern SUV look, but they have distinct identities. The Puma measures between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and stands at 1550 mm to 1555 mm tall, making it a compact yet assertive presence on the road. With a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, the Puma offers ample space for both everyday items and urge-to-wander luggage.
The Captur, slightly larger at 4239 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1575 mm in height, makes a robust statement of sophistication. Despite a modestly smaller trunk volume of 326 to 422 liters, the Captur's smart design makes excellent use of interior space, ensuring comfort and practicality.
Under the hood, both models lay claim to an impressive array of powertrains. The Ford Puma offers a versatile lineup including a Petrol MHEV and a full Electric variant, propelling it with power outputs ranging from 125 to 168 HP. Its acceleration can be as swift as 7.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
The Renault Captur contends with a variety of engines, from Full Hybrid to LPG and Petrol MHEV, boasting powers between 91 to 158 HP. It can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, rivaling the Puma in urban agility.
When it comes to consumption and emissions, the Puma and Captur both make impressive cases for the eco-conscious driver. The Puma boasts a fuel consumption range from 5.4 to 6 L/100 km for its petrol variants and 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km for electric, delivering a significant breadth in efficient driving.
The Captur competes with a fuel consumption scale of 4.7 to 7.8 L/100 km, and a lower CO2 output, which aligns with the varying environmental standards in its class. For drivers prioritizing green credentials, both vehicles offer competitive CO2 efficiency, with the Puma ranging from Class A to E and the Captur from Class C to D.
Driving pleasure is enriched by the varied transmission offerings of both SUVs. The Ford Puma's array includes a Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, and a Reduction Gearbox, paired with its front-wheel-drive system for a driving experience tailored to any urban challenge.
The Renault Captur also offers a diversity of gearboxes, including Automatic and Manual Gearbox options, refining its traditional front-wheel-drive dynamics with smooth and responsive control.
Both the Ford Puma and Renault Captur reflect cutting-edge innovation. Packed with modern technology, they ensure their drivers are met with convenience, safety, and connectivity. From advanced infotainment systems to driver-assisting safety features, Cadillac-esque comfort is no longer exclusive to larger vehicles.
Whether you're navigating the daily commute or exploring further afield, the Ford Puma and Renault Captur stand ready to redefine your driving experience, exhibiting the prowess only finely crafted SUVs can deliver.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Captur is a bit cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,529 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers very slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 7 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.
details
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España