Compare performance (158 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 33,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Volvo EX30?
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Captur and Volvo EX30 stand out as two compelling choices for different reasons. While the Captur appeals with its versatile engine options and practicality, the EX30 showcases the latest in electric vehicle technology and performance. Let’s dive deeper into this comparison, exploring their technical aspects and innovative features.
The Renault Captur offers a diverse range of powertrains, including full hybrid, petrol mild-hybrid, LPG, and petrol engines, providing flexibility for various driving preferences. The Captur's engines generate between 91 HP and 158 HP, with the most powerful variant reaching a top speed of 180 km/h. Acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from a respectable 8.5 seconds to a more leisurely 14.3 seconds, dependent on the engine choice.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 is positioned as a fully electric SUV, which marks a significant shift toward sustainable mobility. With power outputs ranging from 272 HP to a staggering 428 HP, the EX30 offers exhilarating performance, achieving 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 3.6 seconds for its top variant. The top speed is capped at 180 km/h, delivering a sporty driving experience paired with the instant torque characteristic of electric vehicles.
The Renault Captur features a small battery capacity of only 0.6 kWh, focusing more on traditional fuels rather than electrification. Fuel consumption is relatively efficient for an SUV, with figures ranging from 4.7 to 7.8 L/100 km, translating to CO2 emissions of 106 to 139 g/km. The petrol variants also offer respectable trunk capacity between 326 and 422 liters, ideal for daily use.
In stark contrast, the EX30 boasts battery capacities of either 49 kWh or 65 kWh, providing electric ranges from 339 km to an impressive 476 km on a single charge. This exceptional range makes the EX30 suitable for both urban commuting and longer trips, appealing to eco-conscious consumers looking for practicality without sacrificing performance.
Both the Captur and EX30 comfortably seat five passengers and share a similar focus on interior practicality. The Captur's trunk capacity of 326 to 422 liters offers ample space for luggage, making it a highly practical choice for families. The cabin is designed with comfort and functionality in mind, incorporating high-quality materials and innovative technology.
The EX30, while slightly more compact at 318 liters for trunk space, compensates with a modern and advanced interior aesthetic. Volvo's commitment to sustainability is evident through the use of recycled materials, enhancing the interior while minimizing environmental impact. The tech-savvy dashboard includes the latest infotainment systems and safety features synonymous with the Volvo brand.
The Renault Captur comes equipped with a range of technological amenities, including a user-friendly infotainment system, connectivity options, and advanced driver assistance systems. Its compact SUV design is tailored to urban environments, providing maneuverability without sacrificing comfort or safety.
In comparison, the Volvo EX30 represents the forefront of electric vehicle technology. It offers advanced features such as a sophisticated driver-assist package, over-the-air software updates, and a fully digital instrument cluster that enhances the driving experience. Notably, the EX30's efficient energy consumption of approximately 17 to 18.7 kWh/100 km allows for eco-friendly driving without compromising performance.
In summary, the Renault Captur and Volvo EX30 cater to distinct preferences within the compact SUV market. The Captur shines with its versatility in engine options, practicality, and value, making it an enticing choice for budget-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the EX30 sets a benchmark for electric vehicles with its exceptional range, exhilarating performance, and innovative technology, appealing to those ready to embrace the future of driving. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on individual priorities—whether it's efficiency and practicality or pioneering electric performance and sustainability.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Captur is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 33,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,863 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 270 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers clearly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 278 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is markedly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 517 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers clearly more boot space – 422 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,363 L, about 363 L more than the Volvo EX30.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries somewhat more – 453 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
The Volvo EX30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
Length
4,233 mm
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
1,550 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
|
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España