VS

Renault Clio vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Suzuki S-Cross?

Renault Clio vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio is visibly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,705 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers visibly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki S-Cross delivers moderately more torque with 235 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is barely lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,280 kg. The difference is around 78 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers clearly more boot space – 430 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries slightly more – 463 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Renault Clio
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Kona and S‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city‑friendly dimensions with SUV practicality. This comparison highlights the key differences in styling, interior space, powertrains, fuel economy and running costs to help you choose which suits your needs.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Renault Clio
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 118 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Renault Clio have?

The Renault Clio is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.