Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Renault Symbioz vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (158 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (24,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Ford Puma?
Renault Symbioz vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Symbioz
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is only slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 771 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers barely more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers marginally more torque with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Symbioz
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,359 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers only slightly more boot space – 576 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Renault Symbioz
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Symbioz
The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Renault Symbioz
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.