VS

Renault Symbioz vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (24,700 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Skoda Enyaq?

Renault Symbioz vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Symbioz

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Symbioz is substantially cheaper – starting at 24,700 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,163 £.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 414 Nm more.

Symbioz

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Symbioz is considerably lighter – 1,359 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 715 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers marginally more boot space – 585 L compared to 576 L. That’s a difference of about 9 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries a bit more – 526 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Renault Symbioz
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Symbioz

The Renault Symbioz is a forward-looking concept car that imagines a seamless link between vehicle and home, pairing a lounge-like cabin with striking, futuristic styling. More idea than production plan, it showcases Renault's vision for connected, autonomous and sustainable mobility while provoking debate about how we will live and travel.

details
R-DAM_1579937
R-DAM_1580039
R-DAM_1579964

Reviews Renault Symbioz

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
PF
19 Feb 2026, 11:56:45

A delightful hybrid (family car). Roomy, quick (combined nearly 150 hp) and safe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
5 Dec 2025, 23:17:28

I've been driving the Symbioz Full Hybrid with the iconic trim for 3,500 km. I test-drove both cars. I think the win goes to the Symbioz. Good quality at a family-friendly price. Unfortunately the Opel is simply too expensive. Strangely, what never really gets mentioned is that the Symbioz's suspension is absolutely superb.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Austral
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Austral and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different faces of Renault: the Austral is a production compact SUV focused on practicality and comfort, while the Symbioz is a concept show car that explores radical design and future technologies. Comparing them helps buyers choose …
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Renault Symbioz
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
The Renault Symbioz is pure auto theater — a futuristic, electric concept that showcases bold ideas about autonomous driving and cabin-as-living-room luxury rather than everyday practicality. The Mitsubishi Grandis, by contrast, is a dependable, no‑nonsense people‑carrier: roomy, affordable and …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Renault Symbioz
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,700 - 31,100 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 136 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 459 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Renault Symbioz?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.