Compare performance (158 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (24,400 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Symbioz or Suzuki Vitara?
In the bustling automotive world, the SUV segment continues to evolve with innovations and varied technological advancements. This time, we turn our attention to two remarkable contenders: the Renault Symbioz and the Suzuki Vitara. Each holds its own in the competitive market of 2024, yet caters to distinct tastes and preferences.
The Renault Symbioz presents itself as a full hybrid SUV equipped with a 1.6-liter engine. Delivering 143 horsepower and 105 kW of power, it ensures an efficient drive with a fuel consumption of just 4.8 L/100km. This efficiency is further emphasized by its CO2 emission rating of 109 g/km, placing it in the C efficiency class. The Symbioz shines with its combination of a seamless automatic transmission and front-wheel drive.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Vitara offers a broader spectrum of engine configurations, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid variants. Its power output ranges between 116 and 129 horsepower (85 to 95 kW), coupled with different drive types—front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive. Although it slightly trails in fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 5 to 5.6 L/100km, the Vitara compensates with its versatility in driving experience.
Acceleration plays a vital role in evaluating these SUVs. The Renault Symbioz reaches the 100 km/h mark in 10.6 seconds with a maximum speed of 170 km/h. Not to be outdone, the Suzuki Vitara manages a quicker 0-100 km/h sprint in a range starting at 9.5 seconds, also boasting a higher top speed of up to 190 km/h.
Size and space define both these SUVs but in different manners. The Renault Symbioz stands at a length of 4413 mm, a width of 1797 mm, and a height of 1575 mm, combined with a spacious trunk capacity of 492 liters. Designed as a practical urban SUV, it provides a comfortable payload capacity of 427 kg.
In comparison, the Suzuki Vitara showcases a slightly more compact form with lengths measuring 4185 mm, widths of 1775 mm, and heights of 1595 mm. Despite carrying a smaller trunk capacity that ranges between 289 to 375 liters, it manages to appeal to those who prefer agility and ease of parking in tight urban spaces.
The Renault Symbioz, being a hybrid model, focuses on advanced energy efficiency and offers a smooth driving experience with its automatic gearbox. Coupled with a modern yet understated design, it is tailored for those who value eco-friendly driving without compromising on comfort.
The Suzuki Vitara, meanwhile, takes pride in its varied engine options and comes equipped with both manual and automated manual transmissions, catering to diverse driving preferences. Its all-wheel drive version enhances its appeal for adventure seekers keen on off-road endeavors.
Both the Renault Symbioz and the Suzuki Vitara emerge as worthy contenders in the SUV segment, serving different needs. The Symbioz appeals to the eco-conscious urban dweller looking for a stylish, hybrid ride with impressive efficiency. Conversely, the Vitara offers versatility with multiple powertrains and transmission choices, potentially making it a more dynamic option for those who seek versatility both on-road and off.
Ultimately, your choice between these two innovative SUVs will hinge upon your specific lifestyle and driving preferences—ensuring that your next automotive companion aligns perfectly with your personal adventures.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki Vitara is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Renault Symbioz costs 24,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Symbioz uses 4.5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers moderately more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Suzuki Vitara is very slightly faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the Renault Symbioz tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers somewhat more torque with 307 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 42 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is very slightly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,359 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers noticeably more boot space – 576 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 201 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,682 L, about 562 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Symbioz carries only slightly more – 459 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 34 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,400 - 30,700 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,359 - 1,465 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,413 mm
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,682 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
455 - 459 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España