VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 39,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Audi Q4 e-tron?

Skoda Enyaq vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q4 e-tron is barely cheaper – starting at 39,600 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,357 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Audi Q4 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 33 km more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
Skoda Enyaq
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.

details

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.