VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Audi Q6 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 490 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 54,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Audi Q6 e-tron?

Skoda Enyaq vs Audi Q6 e-tron: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • a bit more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq: A Battle of Electric SUVs

The electric revolution is in full swing, and as automakers push the boundaries of innovation, consumers are presented with exceptional choices in the SUV segment. Today, we delve into a comparative analysis of two titans in the electric SUV market - the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles promise to deliver exhilarating performance, advanced technology, and sustainable driving experiences. Let's dig into the details.

Q6 e-tron

Performance and Power: A Thrill for Electric Enthusiasts

When it comes to performance, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers a range of power outputs catering to diverse driving preferences. With power ratings stretching from 292 HP to an impressive 516 HP, the Q6 e-tron can deliver an exhilarating drive, with its top models accelerating from 0-100 km/h in a mere 4.3 seconds. Coupled with a robust torque offering between 450 Nm and 855 Nm, this SUV is designed to impress.

The Skoda Enyaq, while slightly more reserved, is not without its own charms. Offering power outputs from 204 HP to 340 HP, it caters well to both everyday driving and those seeking a bit more oomph. The Enyaq boasts a respectable 0-100 km/h acceleration ranging from 5.5 seconds to 8.1 seconds, complemented by torque figures up to 679 Nm.

Enyaq

Range and Efficiency: Driving Further for Less

Range anxiety is a thing of the past with these electric SUVs. The Audi Q6 e-tron provides a leading range of up to 656 km on a single charge, thanks to its substantial battery capacities of 75.8 kWh and 94.9 kWh. Audi has ensured that drivers can travel long distances efficiently, with consumption figures ranging between 15.6 and 18.9 kWh/100 km.

In comparison, the Skoda Enyaq shines brightly with its maximum range reaching 587 km. With battery options of 59 kWh and 77 kWh, the Enyaq strikes a fine balance between performance and efficiency. Its consumption rates range from 14.6 to 16.4 kWh/100 km, indicating Skoda's commitment to economical electric driving.

Q6 e-tron

Design and Dimensions: Space Meets Sophistication

Both vehicles embody the rugged elegance synonymous with SUVs, each with their own unique design language. The Audi Q6 e-tron stretches to 4771 mm in length, with width options up to 1965 mm and heights ranging from 1665 mm to 1685 mm. With a trunk capacity between 499 L and 526 L, it blends style with practicality seamlessly.

On the other side, the Skoda Enyaq offers slight variations in dimensions across its models, with lengths from 4649 mm to 4658 mm, a consistent width of 1879 mm, and heights spanning 1620 mm to 1623 mm. The Enyaq provides a spacious trunk capacity ranging from 570 L to 585 L, perfect for family outings and gear-heavy trips.

Enyaq

Technological Innovations and Comfort

Technology and comfort are crucial in the modern automotive realm, and both the Q6 e-tron and Enyaq are not lacking in these aspects. Audi, known for its luxurious interiors, imbibes the Q6 e-tron with high-end materials, advanced infotainment systems, and a suite of driver assistance features that elevate comfort and safety.

The Skoda Enyaq, too, surprises with its tech-forward cabin. From intuitive control interfaces to comprehensive connectivity solutions, Skoda ensures the occupants stay entertained and informed. Additionally, the spacious interior layout makes long drives a delightful experience.

Q6 e-tron

Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Perfect Electric Companion

In the showdown between the Audi Q6 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq, it ultimately comes down to individual preferences and priorities. Whether it's Audi's power-packed performance and top-tier luxury, or Skoda's efficiency and practicality that captivate you, both models stand as excellent choices in the burgeoning electric SUV market. Embrace the future of driving with either model, and you won't be disappointed.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Enyaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,580 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is marginally more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the Audi Q6 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 79 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Q6 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers visibly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers noticeably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 176 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is only slightly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 126 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries very slightly more – 540 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
Skoda Enyaq
Audi Q6 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details
Skoda Enyaq
Audi Q6 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
540 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.