VS

Skoda Enyaq vs BMW iX3 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 469 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 54,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or BMW iX3?

Skoda Enyaq vs BMW iX3: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

BMW iX3

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

The Battle of Electrified Titans: BMW iX3 vs. Skoda Enyaq

As the automotive industry pivots towards a more sustainable future, the proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs) has given rise to some formidable contenders in the market. Two such rivals in the all-electric SUV segment are the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq. Both cars represent the state-of-the-art in EV engineering, but they cater to slightly different priorities among electric car enthusiasts. Join us as we dive into the details of these electrified marvels.

iX3

Power and Performance: Beyond Just Numbers

The BMW iX3 offers a mono variant propelled by a robust 210 kW (286 HP) electric motor, channeling power through a sophisticated rear-wheel-drive system. It clocks 0-100 km/h in just about 6.8 seconds, achieving a top speed of 180 km/h. This powertrain ensures that drivers experience a crisp and engaging ride, with 400 Nm of torque instantaneously available for that exhilarating push.

In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq provides a more diverse lineup, catering to varied preferences by offering RWD and AWD versions, with power outputs ranging from 150 kW (204 HP) to a sprightly 250 kW (340 HP). The acceleration figures vary accordingly, with the quickest model sprinting from 0-100 km/h in 5.5 seconds, and top speeds reaching either 160 or 180 km/h. This flexibility allows the Enyaq to cater to a wide array of driving styles and needs.

Enyaq

Range and Efficiency: Traveling the Extra Mile

Electric range is a crucial factor in the adoption of EVs. The BMW iX3 boasts an impressive electric range of 471 km, positioning itself as a reliable long-range option. Its consumption figures stand at 17.6 kWh/100 km, highlighting a commendable balance between performance and efficiency.

The Skoda Enyaq, on the other hand, stretches the limits with the potential to deliver a remarkable range of up to 587 km in its most efficient form, with consumption figures as low as 14.6 kWh/100 km. This astounding efficiency can be attributed to Skoda's meticulous optimization in aerodynamics and weight management.

iX3

Design and Space: Comfort Meets Practicality

Stylistically, both vehicles embrace the contemporary SUV form, but with distinct branding cues. The BMW iX3 strikes a robust road presence with its 4734 mm length, 1891 mm width, and height of 1668 mm, paired with a generous trunk capacity of 510 liters, making it suitable for family adventures and city cruising alike.

The Skoda Enyaq, slightly more compact with lengths varying slightly up to 4658 mm, compensates with an excellent trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, infusing practicality without compromising on roominess, thereby appealing to those who prioritize cargo space.

Enyaq

Conclusion: Which SUV Suits Your Lifestyle?

Deciding between the BMW iX3 and the Skoda Enyaq ultimately depends on personal preference and priorities. Enthusiasts favoring driving dynamics and BMW's premium badge might lean towards the iX3. Meanwhile, those seeking versatility, extensive range options, and a touch of family-oriented practicality may find the Enyaq more aligned with their desires.

Whichever path you choose, both the BMW iX3 and Skoda Enyaq symbolize the dawn of a new green era in automotive engineering, harmonizing performance, efficiency, and innovation in the EV landscape.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: BMW focuses on driving dynamics and efficiency, while Volvo emphasizes safety, interior comfort and tech. This short comparison will show where each model shines so you can choose which suits your priorities.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is substantially cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the BMW iX3 costs 54,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,494 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BMW iX3 is barely more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW iX3 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 805 km, about 216 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

iX3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX3 offers clearly more power – delivering 469 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers barely more torque with 679 Nm compared to 645 Nm. That’s about 34 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is somewhat lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,360 kg. The difference is around 286 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries somewhat more – 526 kg compared to 465 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW iX3 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,300
iX3

BMW iX3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 320 - 469 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 635 - 805 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
BMW iX3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 is an electric SUV that delivers the composed, premium driving experience BMW buyers expect. With a calm, refined cabin and practical everyday usability, it’s a strong choice for those who want electric motoring without giving up luxury and comfort.

details
P90626536_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626665_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626573_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x
P90626566_lowRes_the-new-bmw-ix3-50-x

Reviews BMW iX3

4.6 (4 Reviews)
rate
Johan
20 Sept 2025, 16:15:37

Nice range, fast charging and… bidirectional charging!!

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …
BMW iX2
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
BMW i4
BMW iX3
VS
The BMW i4 is a sporty electric Gran Coupé focused on engaging driving dynamics and a sleek, fastback profile, while the BMW iX3 is a practical electric compact SUV that emphasizes comfort, interior space and everyday usability. Pick the i4 if you value sharper handling and coupe-like styling; …
BMW iX3
BMW X5
VS
Meet the BMW iX3 and the BMW X5: the iX3 is BMW’s quietly efficient all-electric mid-size SUV, while the X5 is the brand’s imposing, go-anywhere luxury SUV with traditional petrol and diesel power. Choosing between them is simple — a city-smart, lower-cost, instant-torque electric every day, or a …
Skoda Enyaq
BMW iX3

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
54,300 - 66,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
635 - 805 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,360 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,895 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
465 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
320 - 469 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
500 - 645 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
235 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
BMW
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.