VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (36,800 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Skoda Enyaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Enyaq

The Electric Dawn: Skoda Enyaq vs Mitsubishi Outlander

The modern automotive landscape is increasingly populated by electrified vehicles, and two key competitors standing out are the Skoda Enyaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander. While both models promise efficiency with a touch of elegance, they offer distinct experiences that cater to different needs and preferences. Let’s delve into the technical aspects and innovations of each to see how they fare against each other.

Outlander

Power and Performance

The Skoda Enyaq is a fully electric SUV designed with performance in mind. Offering power outputs ranging from 204 HP to an impressive 340 HP, it is available in both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. The model accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, which is a testament to its robust electric motor capabilities, delivering torque up to 679 Nm.

On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Outlander is a plugin hybrid that combines the efficiency of electric driving with the flexibility of a gasoline engine. It boasts a solid 306 HP and reaches 0 to 100 km/h in 7.9 seconds. With a 4-cylinder engine and an engine capacity of 2,360 cm³, it provides a different kind of power experience suitable for those still seeking a link to traditional combustion engines.

Enyaq

Range and Efficiency

The Skoda Enyaq shines with its extensive electric range, offering up to 587 km on a single charge, facilitated by a battery capacity of 77 kWh. This range is specifically appealing for drivers looking for zero-emission commutes without anxiety about frequent recharging.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers an electric range of up to 86 km, utilizing a plugin hybrid system. While its electric range is shorter, it provides an overall consumption of just 0.8 L/100 km when the petrol engine comes into play, making it a highly efficient option for mixed driving conditions.

Outlander

Dimensions and Space

With the Skoda Enyaq, drivers enjoy a spacious interior, thanks to its dimensions of up to 4658 mm in length, 1879 mm in width, and a height of around 1622 mm. The trunk capacity is a generous 585 liters, providing enough room for all your luggage on long trips.

The Mitsubishi Outlander, slightly longer at 4719 mm, offers a trunk capacity of 495 liters. The overall dimensions make it a robust option with a solid stance on the road, though the Skoda Enyaq seems to win in terms of boot volume.

Enyaq

Environmental Impact

The Skoda Enyaq leads the charge with a CO2 efficiency class of 'A' and zero emissions, aligning perfectly with a future centered around sustainability.

While the Outlander doesn’t quite match this with a 'B' class rating and 18 g/km of CO2 emissions, its hybrid nature signifies an essential step towards reducing emissions without fully committing to an electric-only vehicle.

Outlander

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander ultimately boils down to your preferences and driving needs. The Enyaq is ideal for those ready to embrace a fully electric future, whereas the Outlander offers a transitional approach with its plugin hybrid technology, providing the best of both electric and traditional driving worlds. Both models are testaments to how innovation in the automotive industry continues to offer diverse and efficient solutions to modern drivers.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is slightly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 504 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers very slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is only slightly lighter – 2,074 kg compared to 2,156 kg. The difference is around 82 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more boot space – 585 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 87 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries very slightly more – 529 kg compared to 526 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details
Skoda Enyaq
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
VIC01568-HDR-Edit-Edit-2
25_Outlander_DSC05046
25_Outlander_DSC05200

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
Vinces
3 Jun 2026, 11:34:17

It's better to choose the modes yourself (electric/internal-combustion) than to let the car decide.
Plenty of storage, but small.
Good handling, reasonable fuel consumption off the highway, but penalizing on the highway.
Lots of annoying "driver-assistance" features, fortunately deactivatable, but you have to do it at every start.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mónica Tobón
8 May 2026, 17:25:26

Me gusta un carro más potente y la marca de fabricación Japonesa me gusta mucho

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mark Joe
4 May 2026, 06:33:44

Best Outlander

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Quick comparison between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which fits your needs. Note: I don’t find any official Skoda model called “Epiq” — did you mean the Skoda Kamiq, Kodiaq, or another Škoda model?
Ford Capri
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Comparing the Capri and the Enyaq is like putting a classic, driver-focused sports coupe head-to-head with a modern electric SUV designed for space, comfort and low running costs. If you’re after character and a sporty drive, the Capri delivers the feel; if you need range, practicality and everyday …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Enyaq
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
498 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,862 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 526 kg
Payload
453 - 529 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.