VS

Skoda Enyaq vs SsangYong Torres comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or SsangYong Torres?

Skoda Enyaq vs SsangYong Torres: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range

SsangYong Torres

  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

SsangYong Torres is clearly cheaper – starting at 33,800 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,066 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the SsangYong Torres. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 125 km more than the SsangYong Torres.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Torres is substantially lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 681 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers a bit more boot space – 703 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries somewhat more – 552 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,900
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 538 - 587 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Skoda Enyaq
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details
serpimg_HNB7qw

Reviews SsangYong Torres

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the Skoda Enyaq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.4
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 are two formidable contenders in the electric SUV market, each offering a unique blend of practicality and innovation. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and clever use of technology, making it a family-friendly choice with a touch of sophistication. …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Skoda Enyaq
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 207 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
4,700 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
1,710 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
552 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
SsangYong
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.